The usual solution is more memory.
You need to tell us what version of SpamAssassin you are running, how
much memory you have in the machine, and how you are using SpamAssassin
including the options. Your mail load will also make a difference.
The SARE rules do consume a lot of memory. But they do
>Subject: Re: SARE rules timing out?
>
>
>The usual solution is more memory.
>You need to tell us what version of SpamAssassin you are running, how
>much memory you have in the machine, and how you are using SpamAssassin
>including the options. Your mail load will also make a
January 06, 2005 1:19 PM
>> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: SARE rules timing out?
>>
>>
>> The usual solution is more memory.
>> You need to tell us what version of SpamAssassin you are running, how
>> much memory you have in the machine, and h
> Does anyone know if any of the SARE rules are causing timeouts? My server
> was bogging down really bad. I removed the custom rules and that seems to
> have fixed it. Only thing is, I don't know which one is causing the
problem.
In general timeouts tend to get caused by net tests. I can't recal
> When the custom rules are present, process times are ranging from 12-45
> seconds per message. This is causing a bottleneck.
>
> It looks like it may be a DNS lookup issue, but I can't be sure.
Ah. If this is a general thing where all messages slow down, then I have to
agree - you probably need
From: "Chris Santerre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Are you saying that using spamd/c gives you problems for users who have
> their own local rules? Just curious as to what problem?
>
> --Chris
I have not migrated Loren over to the new machine because there is a
problem HERE with spamd. I set it down
That is very likely if you have not told it a valid DNS server for
use with the DNS tests.
Can you fire up a local caching only name server?
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "MIKE YRABEDRA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I am using SA 3.0.2, CGPSA 1.4, CommunigatePro, Mac OS X
>
> When the custo
>-Original Message-
>From: jdow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 4:17 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: SARE rules timing out?
>
>
>From: "Chris Santerre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>> Are
From: "Chris Santerre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: jdow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >From: "Chris Santerre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> >> Are you saying that using spamd/c gives you problems for
> >users who have
> >> their own local rules? Just curious as to
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 09:35:53AM -0800, jdow wrote:
>
> If you can duplicate this we can toss a BK bug report into the system.
> I suspect it may have a relationship to the apparent memory leaks that
> are only sort of fixed with 3.0.2.
>
Are you talking about this bug?
http://bugzilla.spamas
From: "Michael Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 09:35:53AM -0800, jdow wrote:
>>
>> If you can duplicate this we can toss a BK bug report into the system.
>> I suspect it may have a relationship to the apparent memory leaks that
>> are only sort of fixed with 3.0.2.
>>
>
> Are
11 matches
Mail list logo
