On 23-Aug-06, at 1:01 PM, Michael Grey wrote:
Sorry, I was too philosophical in my question... to rephrase;
In the standard SA config, should I expect to see an SPF_* rule hit
returned
when the SPF return value is 'none' ?
This is from the latest 50_scores.cf
# SPF
# Note that the benefit
On 23-Aug-06, at 1:09 PM, John D. Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Gino Cerullo wrote:
So the big question is really this : Should "NONE" get an SPF
score ?
That is a matter of internal policy on your part. If you want to
penalize domains for not having an SPF record you could give it a
n
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Gino Cerullo wrote:
> > So the big question is really this : Should "NONE" get an SPF score ?
>
> That is a matter of internal policy on your part. If you want to
> penalize domains for not having an SPF record you could give it a
> negative score. On the other hand, if you w
t 23, 2006 9:54 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: SPF Scoring... SPF_NEUTRAL
On 23-Aug-06, at 12:45 PM, Michael Grey wrote:
> Since this is not a production system, we have had to do some MX
> magic on a
> remote domain to push mail through this new system... that domain
On 23-Aug-06, at 12:45 PM, Michael Grey wrote:
Since this is not a production system, we have had to do some MX
magic on a
remote domain to push mail through this new system... that domain
doesn't
have SPF enabled (curse you Network Solutions !)
So the big question is really this : Should "
?
Thanks
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Noel Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 9:17 AM
To: Michael Grey
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: SPF Scoring... SPF_NEUTRAL
On 8/23/06, Michael Grey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
&
On 8/23/06, Michael Grey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Has anyone experienced SPF_* rules not actually being scored ?
In the debug I see that it comes back as 'result: none' – shouldn't this
come back as SPF_NEUTRAL ?
When the domain does not publish SPF records you get "result: none".
Te
