Sorry, I was too philosophical in my question... to rephrase; In the standard SA config, should I expect to see an SPF_* rule hit returned when the SPF return value is 'none' ?
Thanks Mike -----Original Message----- From: Gino Cerullo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 9:54 AM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: SPF Scoring... SPF_NEUTRAL On 23-Aug-06, at 12:45 PM, Michael Grey wrote: > Since this is not a production system, we have had to do some MX > magic on a > remote domain to push mail through this new system... that domain > doesn't > have SPF enabled (curse you Network Solutions !) > > So the big question is really this : Should "NONE" get an SPF score ? That is a matter of internal policy on your part. If you want to penalize domains for not having an SPF record you could give it a negative score. On the other hand, if you wish to reward them for not having an SPF record give them a positive score. I believe the general consensus is to leave it alone. Especially since SPF is still quite new and still technically in an experimental stage. -- Gino Cerullo Pixel Point Studios 21 Chesham Drive Toronto, ON M3M 1W6 416-247-7740
