Re: a small explanation on rule FORGED_RCVD_HELO

2007-08-14 Thread Matt Kettler
Claude Frantz wrote: > Matt Kettler wrote: > >> It looks for a HELO doesn't match against the reverse DNS for the IP >> address. > > Please note the case of clients connected to the network via NAT and > using dynamic IP addresses. In the general case, such clients do not > known about the IP addre

Re: a small explanation on rule FORGED_RCVD_HELO

2007-08-14 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Claude Frantz wrote on Tue, 14 Aug 2007 11:11:31 +0200: > Please note the case of clients connected to the network via NAT and > using dynamic IP addresses. In the general case, such clients do not > known about the IP address to which one their local address is > translated using NAT. Such cli

Re: a small explanation on rule FORGED_RCVD_HELO

2007-08-14 Thread Claude Frantz
Matt Kettler wrote: It looks for a HELO doesn't match against the reverse DNS for the IP address. Please note the case of clients connected to the network via NAT and using dynamic IP addresses. In the general case, such clients do not known about the IP address to which one their local addr

Re: a small explanation on rule FORGED_RCVD_HELO

2007-08-10 Thread Matt Kettler
Sasori_no_Suna wrote: > hello all , I want just to know about this rule FORGED_RCVD_HELO what does it > mean ? and on the result of spamassassin, why I have always that I need > just explanation thank > It looks for a HELO doesn't match against the reverse DNS for the IP address. However, it

RE: a small explanation on rule FORGED_RCVD_HELO

2007-08-10 Thread Sasori_no_Suna
more explanation please :confused: Sasori_no_Suna wrote: > > ah ok thank you for you answere :handshake: > > Klas Nyström wrote: >> >> My guess is that its when your mailserver receives a mail via SMTP and >> the sender identifies itself as the receiving mailserver or perhaps if it >> identifi

RE: a small explanation on rule FORGED_RCVD_HELO

2007-08-10 Thread Sasori_no_Suna
ah ok thank you for you answere :handshake: Klas Nyström wrote: > > My guess is that its when your mailserver receives a mail via SMTP and the > sender identifies itself as the receiving mailserver or perhaps if it > identifies as a host without reverse lookup. I havnt really looked in to > it b

RE: a small explanation on rule FORGED_RCVD_HELO

2007-08-10 Thread Klas Nyström
My guess is that its when your mailserver receives a mail via SMTP and the sender identifies itself as the receiving mailserver or perhaps if it identifies as a host without reverse lookup. I havnt really looked in to it but can anyone confirm this? /KN -Original Message- From: Sasori