, 2016 10:16 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: local.cf example
On 01.11.16 11:24, Motty Cruz wrote:
>Very strange, missed configuration, here is another header and I have
>not change any configuration and yet this one was scanned:
>X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.604 tagged_abo
On 01.11.16 11:24, Motty Cruz wrote:
Very strange, missed configuration, here is another header and I have not
change any configuration and yet this one was scanned:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.604 tagged_above=-999.9 required=5.6
tests=[AWL=2.468, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=1.076,
header.d=kevineikenberry.com
I'm very confused.
Thanks,
Motty
-Original Message-
From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [mailto:uh...@fantomas.sk]
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2016 9:41 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: local.cf example
On 01.11.16 08:43, Motty Cruz wrote:
&g
On 01.11.16 08:43, Motty Cruz wrote:
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at fqdn.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 5.5
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.5 tagged_above=-999.9 required=5.6
tests=[RDNS_NONE=5.5] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from HOST1.fqdn.com
On Tue, 1 Nov 2016, Motty Cruz wrote:
If I disable AWL:
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at fqdn.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 5.5
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.5 tagged_above=-999.9 required=5.6
tests=[RDNS_NONE=5.5] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from
-
From: RW [mailto:rwmailli...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2016 5:35 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: local.cf example
On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 22:25:54 -0700
motty cruz wrote:
> AWL is allowing spam email through,
It will do, it's a score averager, it moves the sc
On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 22:25:54 -0700
motty cruz wrote:
> AWL is allowing spam email through,
It will do, it's a score averager, it moves the score towards the
average score for the sender.
AWL is vulnerable to spoofing so you check the from address on the
spam. If that's happening you should
