On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 06:27:59PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> Gah! I just found that sha1sum.pl is in MANIFEST.SKIP for some reason.
> WTF?
FWIW, I just put build/md5sum.pl and build/sha1sum.pl back in MANIFEST so
they'll be included in the tarball for 3.1.5 and beyond. :)
--
Randomly G
jdow writes:
> From: "Justin Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Panagiotis Christias writes:
> >> On 8/11/06, DAve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > DAve wrote:
> >> > > Panagiotis Christias wrote:
> >> > >> On 8/11/06, Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > >>> FWIW, the format sa-update e
From: "Justin Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Panagiotis Christias writes:
On 8/11/06, DAve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> DAve wrote:
> > Panagiotis Christias wrote:
> >> On 8/11/06, Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> FWIW, the format sa-update expects is the standard format from sha1su
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 11:42:57AM -0400, Chris Santerre wrote:
If the SARE guys are interested in this project, maybe they could come
up with a list of the most commonly downloaded rulesets.
For the month of Aug to date
1 /rules/70_sare_random.cf
2 /rule
Title: RE: sa-update vs RDJ
> -Original Message-
> From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 11:45 AM
> To: Chris Santerre
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: sa-update vs RDJ
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 1
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 11:42:57AM -0400, Chris Santerre wrote:
> > If the SARE guys are interested in this project, maybe they could come
> > up with a list of the most commonly downloaded rulesets.
>
> For the month of Aug to date
>
> 1 /rules/70_sare_random.cf
> 2 /rules/70_sare_ad
Title: RE: sa-update vs RDJ
>
> If the SARE guys are interested in this project, maybe they could come
> up with a list of the most commonly downloaded rulesets.
For the month of Aug to date
1 /rules/70_sare_random.cf
2 /rules/70_sare_adult.cf
3
Title: RE: sa-update vs RDJ
>> If the SARE guys are interested in this project, maybe they could come
>> up with a list of the most commonly downloaded rulesets.
>They are oddly silent on the subject so far...
We're listening :)
RDJ and SAupdate are reall
> >> Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>
> >> Going further...
> >>
> >> I could see SARE rules offered on many channels though some
> >> reorganization may be required. Channels such as post25,
> >> pre30, header,
> >> body, etc. There are too many rules to have a channel for each but
> >> possibly sets of
Bowie Bailey wrote:
DAve wrote:
I have it working fine here, about 20 lines of /bin/sh and and I can
turn out any number of rule sets, even a channel per SARE rule.
I'm willing to publish the channels if there is interest in them. I
still believe packages or sets of popular rules would be good.
DAve wrote:
>
> I have it working fine here, about 20 lines of /bin/sh and and I can
> turn out any number of rule sets, even a channel per SARE rule.
>
> I'm willing to publish the channels if there is interest in them. I
> still believe packages or sets of popular rules would be good.
> Alterna
Bret Miller wrote:
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
Going further...
I could see SARE rules offered on many channels though some
reorganization may be required. Channels such as post25,
pre30, header,
body, etc. There are too many rules to have a channel for each but
possibly sets of popular rules
Bill Randle wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 22:35 -0400, DAve wrote:
DAve wrote:
Panagiotis Christias wrote:
On 8/11/06, Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FWIW, the format sa-update expects is the standard format from sha1sum.
Does FreeBSD have a sha1sum that produces the format that yo
Panagiotis Christias writes:
> On 8/11/06, DAve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > DAve wrote:
> > > Panagiotis Christias wrote:
> > >> On 8/11/06, Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>> FWIW, the format sa-update expects is the standard format from sha1sum.
> > >>> Does FreeBSD have a sha
On 8/11/06, DAve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
DAve wrote:
> Panagiotis Christias wrote:
>> On 8/11/06, Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> FWIW, the format sa-update expects is the standard format from sha1sum.
>>> Does FreeBSD have a sha1sum that produces the format that you showed?
>>>
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 22:35 -0400, DAve wrote:
> DAve wrote:
> > Panagiotis Christias wrote:
> >> On 8/11/06, Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> FWIW, the format sa-update expects is the standard format from sha1sum.
> >>> Does FreeBSD have a sha1sum that produces the format that you
DAve wrote:
Panagiotis Christias wrote:
On 8/11/06, Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FWIW, the format sa-update expects is the standard format from sha1sum.
Does FreeBSD have a sha1sum that produces the format that you showed?
Answering my own question, FreeBSD seems to not have a "s
Panagiotis Christias wrote:
On 8/11/06, Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FWIW, the format sa-update expects is the standard format from sha1sum.
Does FreeBSD have a sha1sum that produces the format that you showed?
Answering my own question, FreeBSD seems to not have a "sha1sum",
but
On 8/11/06, Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FWIW, the format sa-update expects is the standard format from sha1sum.
Does FreeBSD have a sha1sum that produces the format that you showed?
Answering my own question, FreeBSD seems to not have a "sha1sum",
but has a "sha1" which has that k
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> Randomly Generated Tagline:
> "... specially formulated so more nutrition stays in your cat." - Iams
IAMS doesn't seem to be barfed with any less frequency than any other
cat food brand we've tried, so they're obviously not using an
anti-emetic ingred
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 06:03:23PM -0400, DAve wrote:
> >For now, you may want to either do the openssl redirect thing, or use
> >build/sha1sum.pl from the tarball. Both produce the expected format.
>
> Hmm my 3.1.1 doesn't have sha1sum.pl in build, contrib, or tools. But
> how hard can a wrappe
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 05:12:48PM -0400, DAve wrote:
SpamAssassin sha1 contents (would all be one line) have the signature first,
f7c3edde6e9e2330318c3fc6a8e70af68387eaeb
/home/updatesd/tmp/stage/3.2.0/update.tgzSHA1
My sha1 contents (would all be one line) have the si
DAve wrote:
I ran into one issue but I haven't gotten a chance to look deeper into
it yet. The sha1 file on updates.spamassassin.org is in one format, and
he sha1 file I create is in another. Currently sa-update can't parse my
file so I had to edit it.
SpamAssassin sha1 contents (would all b
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 05:12:48PM -0400, DAve wrote:
> SpamAssassin sha1 contents (would all be one line) have the signature first,
> f7c3edde6e9e2330318c3fc6a8e70af68387eaeb
> /home/updatesd/tmp/stage/3.2.0/update.tgzSHA1
>
> My sha1 contents (would all be one line) have the signature last,
> (
Bret Miller wrote:
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 09:58:19AM -0700, Richard wrote:
>>> rules_du_jour was done when sa-update did not exists
>> are you implying that sa-update replaces rules-du-jour?
>
> That depends on what you mean by "replaces".
>
>> i though sa-update
Bret Miller wrote:
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 09:58:19AM -0700, Richard wrote:
>>> rules_du_jour was done when sa-update did not exists
>> are you implying that sa-update replaces rules-du-jour?
>
> That depends on what you mean by "replaces".
>
>> i though sa-update
> Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 09:58:19AM -0700, Richard wrote:
> >>> rules_du_jour was done when sa-update did not exists
> >> are you implying that sa-update replaces rules-du-jour?
> >
> > That depends on what you mean by "replaces".
> >
> >> i though sa-update updat
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 06:06:02PM -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> Was there an update available on May 8?
There've been updates available for a while now. Since before 3.1.1
came out, which was at the start of March.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"I didn't know Allman was a stand-up comedian ..
On 5/13/06, Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's not empty if the download is successful. I believe there's a ticket
about changing the behavior so an empty directory isn't left behind if the
first attempt to do an update fails.
Sounds good.
> In that case I would argue that eithe
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 04:27:14PM -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> But surely there's some kind of disconnect here. sa-update creates an
> empty directory that spamassassin (and spamd) then uses preferentially
> to the one that really has the rules in it.
It's not empty if the download is successfu
On 5/13/06, Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 10:57:11AM -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> Well, guess what. "sa-update" creates the
> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001001 directory if it does not exist, rather
> than finding the directory that does exist and using that.
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 10:57:11AM -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> Apparently the conflict is only that RDJ restarts spamd automatically,
> but sa-update does not.
I don't believe there's a conflict there, but yes, sa-update does not
auto-restart spamd.
> Default configuration data is loaded
On 5/13/06, Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think there's some kind of conflict between sa-update and
RulesDuJour that has borked my spamassassin installation, but I can't
figure out how.
Apparently the conflict is only that RDJ restarts spamd automatically,
but sa-update does not.
33 matches
Mail list logo
