Re: sare channels

2009-08-24 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
jdow wrote: There is one rule, Ted. If you modify a rule and break it, you get to keep the pieces. :-) Unfortunately, there's too many out there who modify a rule and break it and then don't realize it. Ted {^_-} - Original Message - From: Ted Mittelstaedt t...@ipinc.net Sent:

RE: sare channels

2009-08-21 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 17:35 -0700, Gary Smith wrote: Thanks. I used them years ago back before rulesemporium actually existed, and I know they had value at the time. I just didn't know if the rules were migrated into the mainline or something like that. It's been years since I really had to

Re: sare channels

2009-08-21 Thread mouss
Gary Smith a écrit : Read the top of the rulesemporium site: http://www.rulesemporium.com/ SARE rules aren't being updated. Hence, sa-updating them is pointless. Is it still recommended to run the SARE rules? you should use 90_2tld_cf_sare_sa-update_dostech_net to avoid querying

Re: sare channels

2009-08-21 Thread jdow
There is one rule, Ted. If you modify a rule and break it, you get to keep the pieces. {^_-} - Original Message - From: Ted Mittelstaedt t...@ipinc.net Sent: Thursday, 2009/August/20 17:25 Dave wrote: Hi, Thanks. If the sare rules work great, is it standard practice to use them and

Re: sare channels

2009-08-20 Thread Matt Kettler
Dave wrote: Hello, I'm trying to add additional sa rules and wanted to use the sare channels referenced by the wiki. I'm using sa 3.2.5 and when i atempted to get updates from saupdates.openprotect.com the channel didn't exist. Has it moved? Thanks. Dave. Read the top of the

RE: sare channels

2009-08-20 Thread Gary Smith
Read the top of the rulesemporium site: http://www.rulesemporium.com/ SARE rules aren't being updated. Hence, sa-updating them is pointless. Is it still recommended to run the SARE rules?

Re: sare channels

2009-08-20 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
Gary Smith wrote: Read the top of the rulesemporium site: http://www.rulesemporium.com/ SARE rules aren't being updated. Hence, sa-updating them is pointless. Is it still recommended to run the SARE rules? Try them and if they work, great. Ted

RE: sare channels

2009-08-20 Thread Dave
Kettler'; 'dave.meh...@gmail.com'; 'users@spamassassin.apache.org' Subject: Re: sare channels Gary Smith wrote: Read the top of the rulesemporium site: http://www.rulesemporium.com/ SARE rules aren't being updated. Hence, sa-updating them is pointless. Is it still recommended to run the SARE

Re: sare channels

2009-08-20 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
, August 20, 2009 2:29 PM To: Gary Smith Cc: 'Matt Kettler'; 'dave.meh...@gmail.com'; 'users@spamassassin.apache.org' Subject: Re: sare channels Gary Smith wrote: Read the top of the rulesemporium site: http://www.rulesemporium.com/ SARE rules aren't being updated. Hence, sa-updating them

Re: sare channels

2009-08-20 Thread Matt Kettler
Gary Smith wrote: Read the top of the rulesemporium site: http://www.rulesemporium.com/ SARE rules aren't being updated. Hence, sa-updating them is pointless. Is it still recommended to run the SARE rules? There's nothing wrong with running them if you want.. but using sa-update

RE: sare channels

2009-08-20 Thread Gary Smith
There's nothing wrong with running them if you want.. but using sa-update on them regularly is utterly pointless.. Matt, Thanks. I used them years ago back before rulesemporium actually existed, and I know they had value at the time. I just didn't know if the rules were migrated into