jdow wrote:
There is one rule, Ted. If you modify a rule and break it, you get to
keep the pieces.
:-)
Unfortunately, there's too many out there who modify a rule and break it
and then don't realize it.
Ted
{^_-}
- Original Message - From: Ted Mittelstaedt t...@ipinc.net
Sent:
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 17:35 -0700, Gary Smith wrote:
Thanks. I used them years ago back before rulesemporium actually
existed, and I know they had value at the time. I just didn't know if
the rules were migrated into the mainline or something like that.
It's been years since I really had to
Gary Smith a écrit :
Read the top of the rulesemporium site:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/
SARE rules aren't being updated. Hence, sa-updating them is pointless.
Is it still recommended to run the SARE rules?
you should use
90_2tld_cf_sare_sa-update_dostech_net
to avoid querying
There is one rule, Ted. If you modify a rule and break it, you get to
keep the pieces.
{^_-}
- Original Message -
From: Ted Mittelstaedt t...@ipinc.net
Sent: Thursday, 2009/August/20 17:25
Dave wrote:
Hi,
Thanks. If the sare rules work great, is it standard practice to use
them and
Dave wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to add additional sa rules and wanted to use the sare
channels referenced by the wiki. I'm using sa 3.2.5 and when i atempted to
get updates from saupdates.openprotect.com the channel didn't exist. Has it
moved?
Thanks.
Dave.
Read the top of the
Read the top of the rulesemporium site:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/
SARE rules aren't being updated. Hence, sa-updating them is pointless.
Is it still recommended to run the SARE rules?
Gary Smith wrote:
Read the top of the rulesemporium site:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/
SARE rules aren't being updated. Hence, sa-updating them is pointless.
Is it still recommended to run the SARE rules?
Try them and if they work, great.
Ted
Kettler'; 'dave.meh...@gmail.com'; 'users@spamassassin.apache.org'
Subject: Re: sare channels
Gary Smith wrote:
Read the top of the rulesemporium site:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/
SARE rules aren't being updated. Hence, sa-updating them is pointless.
Is it still recommended to run the SARE
, August 20, 2009 2:29 PM
To: Gary Smith
Cc: 'Matt Kettler'; 'dave.meh...@gmail.com'; 'users@spamassassin.apache.org'
Subject: Re: sare channels
Gary Smith wrote:
Read the top of the rulesemporium site:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/
SARE rules aren't being updated. Hence, sa-updating them
Gary Smith wrote:
Read the top of the rulesemporium site:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/
SARE rules aren't being updated. Hence, sa-updating them is pointless.
Is it still recommended to run the SARE rules?
There's nothing wrong with running them if you want.. but using
sa-update
There's nothing wrong with running them if you want.. but using
sa-update on them regularly is utterly pointless..
Matt,
Thanks. I used them years ago back before rulesemporium actually existed, and
I know they had value at the time. I just didn't know if the rules were
migrated into
11 matches
Mail list logo