Re: Razor issues with SpamAssassin (update)

2005-06-09 Thread Jonathan Lutz
You're right.  I am running it as a daemon, and it seems SuSE 9 ships with a /etc/sysconfig/spamd file that includes (for some godawful reason) the -L option.   I have just removed that and it seems to be using network tests now.  Yes!!   Thanks again...   JON  >>> Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Razor issues with SpamAssassin (update)

2005-06-09 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 12:51:33PM -0400, Jonathan Lutz wrote: > However, when I run: spamassassin -D -t < spamfile on it, it shows a > whole bunch more such as DCC_CHECK and a bunch of URIBL tags as it > should. Network checks are seemingly only working on a "local" level. > > Any reason why t

Re: Razor issues with SpamAssassin (update)

2005-06-09 Thread Jonathan Lutz
An update to this problem:   I have a piece of spam that was not identified as such. The header shows only: *  1.7 SARE_RECV_FEP5 Message contains known spam format   However, when I run: spamassassin -D -t < spamfile on it, it shows a whole bunch more such as DCC_CHECK and a bunch of URIBL tags

Re: Razor issues with SpamAssassin

2005-06-08 Thread Matt Kettler
Jonathan Lutz wrote: > I have just set up a little mail server with Postfx and Spamassassin > 2.63 with the newest Razor installed (of course). Spamassassin seems > to be working fine, and running spamassassin -D --lint shows Razor > appearing to be working fine.. but unfortunately it is not taggi

Razor issues with SpamAssassin

2005-06-08 Thread Jonathan Lutz
I have just set up a little mail server with Postfx and Spamassassin2.63 with the newest Razor installed (of course).  Spamassassin seemsto be working fine, and running spamassassin -D --lint shows Razorappearing to be working fine.. but unfortunately it is not tagging anymessages.  So far I have