On Sat, 11 Jul 2009, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
I still wonder, though, if we shouldn't be turning these back into
hostnames and looking them up in the regular URI blacklists
Given the obvious objections to having the primary URIBL mechanism try to
parse obfuscations, I once again questio
From: Jason L Tibbitts III [mailto:ti...@math.uh.edu]
>> "MD" == McDonald, Dan writes:
>
>MD> The rules I posted last night catch those. They switched from
underscores to commas this morning, and my rules still catch them.
>I still wonder, though, if we shouldn't be turning these back into
>hos
> "MD" == McDonald, Dan writes:
MD> The rules I posted last night catch those. They switched from
MD> underscores to commas this morning, and my rules still catch them.
FYI, they're also using plus signs, which also seem to be caught
properly by your rules. I think we're good until they sw