On 28.09.11 10:07, Lars Jørgensen wrote:
Not sure if this is the correct forum, but google couldn't help me
(or I am too low on caffeine).
I get a lot of spam that would have been flagged as such, but a bayes
score of -1.9 pulls it down to hammy status.
I train Bayes manually on the borderli
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:30:32 +0200
Lars Jørgensen wrote:
> Looking at
> http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.3.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html#learning_options
>
> i see an option called "bayes_use_hapaxes" that promises
> significantly better hit-rates, but also increases database size by a
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:30:32 +0200, Lars Jørgensen wrote:
On 28-09-2011 13:20, Benny Pedersen wrote:
I train Bayes manually on the borderline cases, but also have
auto-learning enabled. Is that really a bad idea? Should I disable
it,
delete the bayes-databases and start over on manual-only lea
On 28-09-2011 13:20, Benny Pedersen wrote:
I train Bayes manually on the borderline cases, but also have
auto-learning enabled. Is that really a bad idea? Should I disable it,
delete the bayes-databases and start over on manual-only learning?
no training is always good
Are you missing a comma
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:07:55 +0200, Lars Jørgensen wrote:
Hi,
Not sure if this is the correct forum, but google couldn't help me
(or I am too low on caffeine).
I get a lot of spam that would have been flagged as such, but a bayes
score of -1.9 pulls it down to hammy status.
I train Bayes manua
