On 5/2/2023 1:02 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
That is a terrible idea. There are perfectly good reasons for a domain
to only sign some mail. Justifying a +3 score on something which is
only wrong *IN YOUR HEAD* is hard.
ADSP and DMARC both exist apart from DKIM. It is an entirely valid
choice to NO
Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2023-05-02 19:25:
Greg Troxel skrev den 2023-05-02 18:29:
DKIM_MISSING Domain has DKIM records but message has no DKIM
signature
On 02.05.23 18:59, Benny Pedersen wrote:
there is no _domainkeys in dns
sorry, it's _domainkey.example.com
example.com have rfc
Greg Troxel skrev den 2023-05-02 18:29:
DKIM_MISSINGDomain has DKIM records but message has no DKIM signature
On 02.05.23 18:59, Benny Pedersen wrote:
there is no _domainkeys in dns
sorry, it's _domainkey.example.com
with maybe +3 to start, as a sort-of-soft-impliced-DMARC.
yes _dmar
On 2023-05-02 at 12:29:53 UTC-0400 (Tue, 02 May 2023 12:29:53 -0400)
Greg Troxel
is rumored to have said:
Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
On 02.05.23 08:37, Thomas Johnson wrote:
If there’s no dkim signature, you can’t check for dkim records
in
dns. The selector for a dkim signature is arb
Greg Troxel skrev den 2023-05-02 18:29:
DKIM_MISSINGDomain has DKIM records but message has no DKIM signature
no
there is no _domainkeys in dns
with maybe +3 to start, as a sort-of-soft-impliced-DMARC.
yes _dmarc is in dns
(surely this is doable in a plugin; it's not conceptually ha
Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
> On 02.05.23 08:37, Thomas Johnson wrote:
>> If there’s no dkim signature, you can’t check for dkim records in
>> dns. The selector for a dkim signature is arbitrary - there’s no
>> one dns lookup you can do to see all possible dkim records for a
>> domain.
>
> a
> Right, because you need to grovel out the selector from the
> DKIM-Signature line. Groan.
>
> That you can't mark a domain as requiring DKIM at the top-level seems
> to be a design flaw in the protocol.
Yes, but I think the way that is fixed is spelled DMARC.
On May 2, 2023, at 8:27 AM, Philip Prindeville
wrote:
Is there a way to add scoring that says, "If the sending domain has DKIM
records, but there's no DKIM signature on this message, then attach a
high score to it?"
We seem to attach negative scores when DKIM is present and valid, but
what
> On May 2, 2023, at 9:37 AM, Thomas Johnson wrote:
>
>
>> On May 2, 2023, at 8:27 AM, Philip Prindeville
>> wrote:
>>
>> Is there a way to add scoring that says, "If the sending domain has DKIM
>> records, but there's no DKIM signature on this message, then attach a high
>> score to it
> On May 2, 2023, at 8:27 AM, Philip Prindeville
> wrote:
>
> Is there a way to add scoring that says, "If the sending domain has DKIM
> records, but there's no DKIM signature on this message, then attach a high
> score to it?"
>
> We seem to attach negative scores when DKIM is present and
Philip Prindeville skrev den 2023-05-02 17:26:
Is there a way to add scoring that says, "If the sending domain has
DKIM records, but there's no DKIM signature on this message, then
attach a high score to it?"
We seem to attach negative scores when DKIM is present and valid, but
what about the op
11 matches
Mail list logo
