RE: rule secrecy *again* (Re: Well, that didn't take very bloody long)

2006-11-13 Thread Chris Santerre
Title: RE: rule secrecy *again* (Re: Well, that didn't take very bloody long) > > ho hum... here we go again. :( :)  >Secrecy is *NOT* an essential element of rule development.  It seems >logical to think it is, but evidence repeatedly demonstrates otherwise. You know

Re: rule secrecy *again* (Re: Well, that didn't take very bloody long)

2006-11-11 Thread jdow
From: "Justin Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Loren Wilton writes: > Ok, remember that "Name Wrote: :)" emails? They've completely > changed. Now it's "hi username" instead. Joy, oh joy. Can anyone find > any common elements in these emails because whoever this putz is, they're > adaptin

Re: rule secrecy *again* (Re: Well, that didn't take very bloody long)

2006-11-11 Thread Steve Lake
At 12:27 PM 11/11/2006 +, Justin Mason wrote: ho hum... here we go again. :( As I've noted several times recently -- these *are* being caught by rules which were developed "in the open" -- namely RCVD_FORGED_WROTE, which has been sitting in my sandbox for several weeks, was announced in a ch

rule secrecy *again* (Re: Well, that didn't take very bloody long)

2006-11-11 Thread Justin Mason
Loren Wilton writes: > > Ok, remember that "Name Wrote: :)" emails? They've completely > > changed. Now it's "hi username" instead. Joy, oh joy. Can anyone find > > any common elements in these emails because whoever this putz is, they're > > adapting a lot. They hit us, we adapt,

RE: Well, that didn't take very bloody long

2006-11-11 Thread Randal, Phil
: Steve Lake Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Well, that didn't take very bloody long On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Steve Lake wrote: > Ok, remember that "Name Wrote: :)" emails? They've completely > changed. Now it's "hi username" instead. Joy,

Re: Well, that didn't take very bloody long

2006-11-11 Thread jdow
From: "Steve Lake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ok, remember that "Name Wrote: :)" emails? They've completely changed. Now it's "hi username" instead. Joy, oh joy. Can anyone find any common elements in these emails because whoever this putz is, they're adapting a lot. They hit us, we adapt

Re: Well, that didn't take very bloody long

2006-11-10 Thread John Rudd
Steve Lake wrote: Ok, remember that "Name Wrote: :)" emails? They've completely changed. Now it's "hi username" instead. Joy, oh joy. Can anyone find any common elements in these emails because whoever this putz is, they're adapting a lot. They hit us, we adapt, they immediately ch

Re: Well, that didn't take very bloody long

2006-11-10 Thread Loren Wilton
Ok, remember that "Name Wrote: :)" emails? They've completely changed. Now it's "hi username" instead. Joy, oh joy. Can anyone find any common elements in these emails because whoever this putz is, they're adapting a lot. They hit us, we adapt, they immediately change tactics and c

Re: Well, that didn't take very bloody long

2006-11-10 Thread Jon Trulson
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Steve Lake wrote: Ok, remember that "Name Wrote: :)" emails? They've completely changed. Now it's "hi username" instead. Joy, oh joy. Can anyone find any common elements in these emails because whoever this putz is, they're adapting a lot. They hit us, we adapt

Re: Well, that didn't take very bloody long

2006-11-10 Thread Tony Finch
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Steve Lake wrote: > Ok, remember that "Name Wrote: :)" emails? They've completely > changed. Now it's "hi username" instead. Joy, oh joy. Can anyone find any > common elements in these emails because whoever this putz is, they're adapting > a lot. http://article.g

Re: Well, that didn't take very bloody long

2006-11-10 Thread Duane Hill
Kelson wrote: Steve Lake wrote: Ok, remember that "Name Wrote: :)" emails? They've completely changed. Now it's "hi username" instead. Joy, oh joy. Can anyone find any common elements in these emails because whoever this putz is, they're adapting a lot. They hit us, we adapt, they

Re: Well, that didn't take very bloody long

2006-11-10 Thread Kelson
Steve Lake wrote: Ok, remember that "Name Wrote: :)" emails? They've completely changed. Now it's "hi username" instead. Joy, oh joy. Can anyone find any common elements in these emails because whoever this putz is, they're adapting a lot. They hit us, we adapt, they immediately ch

Re: Well, that didn't take very bloody long

2006-11-10 Thread Justin Mason
also, RCVD_FORGED_WROTE is still hitting them. (my motto: aim for the Received headers ;) --j. Chris Santerre writes: > > -Original Message- > > From: Steve Lake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 12:52 PM > > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > > Subject: Well

Re: Well, that didn't take very bloody long

2006-11-10 Thread Jim Maul
Chris Santerre wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Steve Lake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 12:52 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Well, that didn't take very bloody long > > > Ok, remember that "Name Wrote: :)" emails? Th

RE: Well, that didn't take very bloody long

2006-11-10 Thread Chris Santerre
Title: RE: Well, that didn't take very bloody long > -Original Message- > From: Steve Lake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 12:52 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Well, that didn't take very bloody long > >

Re: Well, that didn't take very bloody long

2006-11-10 Thread Kris Deugau
Steve Lake wrote: > Ok, remember that "Name Wrote: :)" emails? They've completely > changed. Now it's "hi username" instead. After feeding 10 or 20 into Bayes, they're no longer showing up in *my* inbox, nor customer inboxes based on the lack of forwarded copies. (The ones I've been s