On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 01:49 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> The sa-learn --spam can process a message in 5 to 10 seconds or so, so if
> I've
> dropped 20 doofus mails in the spam directory and fire it off, I have it done
> and kmail is back among the living in 2-3 minutes.
This seems *way* too hig
On Friday 08 February 2008, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 01:49 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> The sa-learn --spam can process a message in 5 to 10 seconds or so, so if
>> I've dropped 20 doofus mails in the spam directory and fire it off, I have
>> it done and kmail is back amon
From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, 2008, February 08 16:43
On Friday 08 February 2008, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 01:49 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
The command that kmail issues to it is:
sa-learn --ham /root/Mail/(foldername)/cur
You're not using
On Friday 08 February 2008, jdow wrote:
>From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, 2008, February 08 16:43
>
>> On Friday 08 February 2008, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>>>On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 01:49 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
The command that kmail issues to it is:
sa-learn -
Gene Heskett sez:
>
> running as root since RH5.1. Yeah, I'm an un-repentant old fart.
There's no fool like an old fool.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4
On Saturday 09 February 2008, John Hardin wrote:
>Gene Heskett sez:
>> running as root since RH5.1. Yeah, I'm an un-repentant old fart.
>
>There's no fool like an old fool.
And that's why they pay me the big bucks when something really goes aglay at
the tv station even if I have been semi-retire
From: "John Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, 2008, February 08 21:03
Gene Heskett sez:
running as root since RH5.1. Yeah, I'm an un-repentant old fart.
There's no fool like an old fool.
I'm close enough to Gene's age and have known him long enough I get
the right to rap his knuck
On Saturday 09 February 2008, jdow wrote:
>From: "John Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, 2008, February 08 21:03
>
>> Gene Heskett sez:
>>> running as root since RH5.1. Yeah, I'm an un-repentant old fart.
>>
>> There's no fool like an old fool.
>
>I'm close enough to Gene's age and have k
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Saturday 09 February 2008, jdow wrote:
From: "John Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, 2008, February 08 21:03
Gene Heskett sez:
running as root since RH5.1. Yeah, I'm an un-repentant old fart.
There's no fool like an old fool.
Am 2008-02-08 01:49:52, schrieb Gene Heskett:
> So what is the maximum number of files in a directory that one can feed to
> sa-learn --ham and expect it to achieve normal speed? I vaguely recall
> feeding it my corpus of another folder it was having trouble with a year ago,
> the linux-usb lis
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 10 February 2008, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2008-02-08 20:13:10, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
So what is the maximum number of files in a directory that one can feed
to sa-learn --ham and expect it to achieve normal speed?
Dunno if there ar
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 21:34 +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2008-02-08 20:13:10, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
> > > So what is the maximum number of files in a directory that one can feed
> > > to
> > > sa-learn --ham and expect it to achieve normal speed?
> >
> > Dunno if there are limitati
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:04:28PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Guilty, its all in Mail dir format.
--dir ?
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
"There are all of these warnings and incantations and unnatural rituals
and everything's veiled in this threat of "you mess with the mayo,
the mayo mess wit
On Sunday 10 February 2008, Michelle Konzack wrote:
>Am 2008-02-08 20:13:10, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
>> > So what is the maximum number of files in a directory that one can feed
>> > to sa-learn --ham and expect it to achieve normal speed?
>>
>> Dunno if there are limitations -- however, your
Am 2008-02-08 20:13:10, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
> > So what is the maximum number of files in a directory that one can feed to
> > sa-learn --ham and expect it to achieve normal speed?
>
> Dunno if there are limitations -- however, your 7k messages should be
> perfectly fine. Just ran a test
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, John Hardin wrote:
>On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Sunday 10 February 2008, Michelle Konzack wrote:
>>> Am 2008-02-08 20:13:10, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
> So what is the maximum number of files in a directory that one can feed
> to sa-learn -
> Am 2008-02-08 01:49:52, schrieb Gene Heskett:
> > So what is the maximum number of files in a directory that one can feed to
> > sa-learn --ham and expect it to achieve normal speed? I vaguely recall
> > feeding it my corpus of another folder it was having trouble with a year
> > ago,
> > th
> Am 2008-02-08 20:13:10, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
> > > So what is the maximum number of files in a directory that one can feed
> > > to
> > > sa-learn --ham and expect it to achieve normal speed?
> >
> > Dunno if there are limitations -- however, your 7k messages should be
> > perfectly fi
Am 2008-02-13 05:14:38, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
> On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 21:34 +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > Am 2008-02-08 20:13:10, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
> > > > So what is the maximum number of files in a directory that one can feed
> > > > to
> > > > sa-learn --ham and expect i
Am 2008-02-13 10:04:36, schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
> you can just provide te directory name. sa-learn will then scan the
> directory w/o args limit
Sory, but I use "--dir" since ages and if I have over 1200-1400 messages
sa-learn exit with an error message that I have exceed the limits...
Th
20 matches
Mail list logo
