jdow wrote:
There is one rule, Ted. "If you modify a rule and break it, you get to
keep the pieces."
:-)
Unfortunately, there's too many out there who modify a rule and break it
and then don't realize it.
Ted
{^_-}
- Original Message - From: "Ted Mittelstaedt"
Sent: Thursday, 2009
There is one rule, Ted. "If you modify a rule and break it, you get to
keep the pieces."
{^_-}
- Original Message -
From: "Ted Mittelstaedt"
Sent: Thursday, 2009/August/20 17:25
Dave wrote:
Hi,
Thanks. If the sare rules work great, is it standard practice to use
them and they catch
Gary Smith a écrit :
>> Read the top of the rulesemporium site:
>>
>> http://www.rulesemporium.com/
>>
>> SARE rules aren't being updated. Hence, sa-updating them is pointless.
>
> Is it still recommended to run the SARE rules?
you should use
90_2tld_cf_sare_sa-update_dostech_net
to avoid
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 17:35 -0700, Gary Smith wrote:
> Thanks. I used them years ago back before rulesemporium actually
> existed, and I know they had value at the time. I just didn't know if
> the rules were migrated into the mainline or something like that.
> It's been years since I really had
> >
> There's nothing wrong with running them if you want.. but using
> sa-update on them regularly is utterly pointless..
Matt,
Thanks. I used them years ago back before rulesemporium actually existed, and
I know they had value at the time. I just didn't know if the rules were
migrated into
Gary Smith wrote:
>> Read the top of the rulesemporium site:
>>
>> http://www.rulesemporium.com/
>>
>> SARE rules aren't being updated. Hence, sa-updating them is pointless.
>>
>
> Is it still recommended to run the SARE rules?
>
>
>
There's nothing wrong with running them if you want.. but
rsday, August 20, 2009 2:29 PM
To: Gary Smith
Cc: 'Matt Kettler'; 'dave.meh...@gmail.com'; 'users@spamassassin.apache.org'
Subject: Re: sare channels
Gary Smith wrote:
Read the top of the rulesemporium site:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/
SARE rules aren't b
;Matt Kettler'; 'dave.meh...@gmail.com'; 'users@spamassassin.apache.org'
Subject: Re: sare channels
Gary Smith wrote:
>> Read the top of the rulesemporium site:
>>
>> http://www.rulesemporium.com/
>>
>> SARE rules aren't being updated. Hence, s
Gary Smith wrote:
Read the top of the rulesemporium site:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/
SARE rules aren't being updated. Hence, sa-updating them is pointless.
Is it still recommended to run the SARE rules?
Try them and if they work, great.
Ted
> Read the top of the rulesemporium site:
>
> http://www.rulesemporium.com/
>
> SARE rules aren't being updated. Hence, sa-updating them is pointless.
Is it still recommended to run the SARE rules?
Dave wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm trying to add additional sa rules and wanted to use the sare
> channels referenced by the wiki. I'm using sa 3.2.5 and when i atempted to
> get updates from saupdates.openprotect.com the channel didn't exist. Has it
> moved?
> Thanks.
> Dave.
>
>
>
Read the top o
11 matches
Mail list logo