Re: sare channels

2009-08-24 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
jdow wrote: There is one rule, Ted. "If you modify a rule and break it, you get to keep the pieces." :-) Unfortunately, there's too many out there who modify a rule and break it and then don't realize it. Ted {^_-} - Original Message - From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" Sent: Thursday, 2009

Re: sare channels

2009-08-21 Thread jdow
There is one rule, Ted. "If you modify a rule and break it, you get to keep the pieces." {^_-} - Original Message - From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" Sent: Thursday, 2009/August/20 17:25 Dave wrote: Hi, Thanks. If the sare rules work great, is it standard practice to use them and they catch

Re: sare channels

2009-08-21 Thread mouss
Gary Smith a écrit : >> Read the top of the rulesemporium site: >> >> http://www.rulesemporium.com/ >> >> SARE rules aren't being updated. Hence, sa-updating them is pointless. > > Is it still recommended to run the SARE rules? you should use 90_2tld_cf_sare_sa-update_dostech_net to avoid

RE: sare channels

2009-08-21 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 17:35 -0700, Gary Smith wrote: > Thanks. I used them years ago back before rulesemporium actually > existed, and I know they had value at the time. I just didn't know if > the rules were migrated into the mainline or something like that. > It's been years since I really had

RE: sare channels

2009-08-20 Thread Gary Smith
> > > There's nothing wrong with running them if you want.. but using > sa-update on them regularly is utterly pointless.. Matt, Thanks. I used them years ago back before rulesemporium actually existed, and I know they had value at the time. I just didn't know if the rules were migrated into

Re: sare channels

2009-08-20 Thread Matt Kettler
Gary Smith wrote: >> Read the top of the rulesemporium site: >> >> http://www.rulesemporium.com/ >> >> SARE rules aren't being updated. Hence, sa-updating them is pointless. >> > > Is it still recommended to run the SARE rules? > > > There's nothing wrong with running them if you want.. but

Re: sare channels

2009-08-20 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
rsday, August 20, 2009 2:29 PM To: Gary Smith Cc: 'Matt Kettler'; 'dave.meh...@gmail.com'; 'users@spamassassin.apache.org' Subject: Re: sare channels Gary Smith wrote: Read the top of the rulesemporium site: http://www.rulesemporium.com/ SARE rules aren't b

RE: sare channels

2009-08-20 Thread Dave
;Matt Kettler'; 'dave.meh...@gmail.com'; 'users@spamassassin.apache.org' Subject: Re: sare channels Gary Smith wrote: >> Read the top of the rulesemporium site: >> >> http://www.rulesemporium.com/ >> >> SARE rules aren't being updated. Hence, s

Re: sare channels

2009-08-20 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
Gary Smith wrote: Read the top of the rulesemporium site: http://www.rulesemporium.com/ SARE rules aren't being updated. Hence, sa-updating them is pointless. Is it still recommended to run the SARE rules? Try them and if they work, great. Ted

RE: sare channels

2009-08-20 Thread Gary Smith
> Read the top of the rulesemporium site: > > http://www.rulesemporium.com/ > > SARE rules aren't being updated. Hence, sa-updating them is pointless. Is it still recommended to run the SARE rules?

Re: sare channels

2009-08-20 Thread Matt Kettler
Dave wrote: > Hello, > I'm trying to add additional sa rules and wanted to use the sare > channels referenced by the wiki. I'm using sa 3.2.5 and when i atempted to > get updates from saupdates.openprotect.com the channel didn't exist. Has it > moved? > Thanks. > Dave. > > > Read the top o