Re: Relative Kill Scores, 2.63 to 3.1?

2005-10-17 Thread Michael Monnerie
On Montag, 17. Oktober 2005 16:52 Spam Admin wrote: > So, to temporarily resolve this, I bumped our kill_level to 5.9 and > am monitoring it; my false positives have pretty much disappeared. Of > course, I've seen a *slight* increase in fasle negatives versus 2.63, > so I'll be tuning. I use 5.0 (

RE: Relative Kill Scores, 2.63 to 3.1?

2005-10-17 Thread Bowie Bailey
From: Spam Admin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Last week I upgraded our system from SA v2.63 to v3.1; I am > pleased at how well the process went. However, I immediately > began to see a lot of false positives. Primarily, it seems > that v3.1 has increased the BAYES_00 from -4 to -2.599, and >

Re: Relative Kill Scores, 2.63 to 3.1?

2005-10-17 Thread Matt Kettler
Spam Admin wrote: > I've been running SA as our main inbound SMTP gateway in front of our > GroupWise system for about 18 months now. I process, filter, and quarantine > for the whole enterprise and do not offer individual user control. I use > postfix, amavisd, SA w/ Bayes, RDJ, Razor, some min

Relative Kill Scores, 2.63 to 3.1?

2005-10-17 Thread Spam Admin
I've been running SA as our main inbound SMTP gateway in front of our GroupWise system for about 18 months now. I process, filter, and quarantine for the whole enterprise and do not offer individual user control. I use postfix, amavisd, SA w/ Bayes, RDJ, Razor, some minimal SMTP-level RBLs, CA