On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Geoff Soper
wrote:
>
> OK, I'm slightly confused as to what the advice is here. Is there consensus
> on SAREs? Should I still use them (via the channel list described at
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SareChannels ) or is it better not to
> use them? I get
On Wed 13 Jan 2010 04:11:45 PM CET, Geoff Soper wrote
I'll certainly add sought.rules.yerp.org and
90_2tld.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net to updates.spamassassin.org as
suggested by Jason.
delete all files in the 3.2.5 sa update dir, use sa-update again
so all sa-update rules gets loaded, pr
Geoff Soper wrote:
OK, I'm slightly confused as to what the advice is here. Is there
consensus on SAREs? Should I still use them (via the channel list
described at http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SareChannels ) or is it
better not to use them? I get the impression that there is consensus
On 13/01/2010 15:03, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Wed 13 Jan 2010 02:53:13 PM CET, Geoff Soper wrote
saupdates.openprotect.com channel which contains recommended SAREs
rules and all is working!
outdated sare rules is not recommended, and openprotect do care ? :)
if you update sare rules via sa-
On Wed 13 Jan 2010 02:53:13 PM CET, Geoff Soper wrote
saupdates.openprotect.com channel which contains recommended SAREs
rules and all is working!
outdated sare rules is not recommended, and openprotect do care ? :)
if you update sare rules via sa-update it would work, if you do some
other
geoff.spamassass...@alphaworks.co.uk wrote:
Thanks for that, can you point me in the direction of some info on the
90_2tld.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net channel? I found
http://taint.org/2007/08/15/004348a.html in relation to
sought.rules.yerp.org
Info is included in the file itself:
# uti
Thanks for that, can you point me in the direction of some info on the
90_2tld.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net channel? I found
http://taint.org/2007/08/15/004348a.html in relation to
sought.rules.yerp.org
Thanks,
Geoff
On 13/01/2010 14:35, Jason Bertoch wrote:
Jason Bertoch wrote:
geoff.spam
Jason Bertoch wrote:
geoff.spamassass...@alphaworks.co.uk wrote:
On 13/01/2010 14:02, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Geoff Soper
wrote:
I've now added the saupdates.openprotect.com
channel which contains recommended SAREs rules and all is working!
I though
geoff.spamassass...@alphaworks.co.uk wrote:
On 13/01/2010 14:02, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Geoff Soper
wrote:
I've now added the saupdates.openprotect.com
channel which contains recommended SAREs rules and all is working!
I thought I read that no one
On 13/01/2010 14:02, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Geoff Soper
wrote:
I've now added the saupdates.openprotect.com
channel which contains recommended SAREs rules and all is working!
I thought I read that no one should be using openprotect as it's
hoplessl
On 13/01/2010 13:46, Jason Bertoch wrote:
geoff.spamassass...@alphaworks.co.uk wrote:
I'm using SA 3.2.5 and sa-update but SA doesn't seem to be picking
rules up from /var/lib/spamassassin/
Can anyone advise what the problem might be and what diagnosis I can
perform?
The output of 'spamassas
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Geoff Soper
wrote:
> I've now added the saupdates.openprotect.com
> channel which contains recommended SAREs rules and all is working!
I thought I read that no one should be using openprotect as it's
hoplessly out of date. ??
--
-ste
On 13/01/2010 13:46, Jason Bertoch wrote:
geoff.spamassass...@alphaworks.co.uk wrote:
I'm using SA 3.2.5 and sa-update but SA doesn't seem to be picking
rules up from /var/lib/spamassassin/
Can anyone advise what the problem might be and what diagnosis I can
perform?
The output of 'spamas
geoff.spamassass...@alphaworks.co.uk wrote on Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:59:11
+:
> I'm using SA 3.2.5 and sa-update but SA doesn't seem to be picking rules
> up from /var/lib/spamassassin/
Well, you listed a lot, but not any proof for what you think it *seems* not
to do.
Kai
--
Get your web a
geoff.spamassass...@alphaworks.co.uk wrote:
I'm using SA 3.2.5 and sa-update but SA doesn't seem to be picking rules
up from /var/lib/spamassassin/
Can anyone advise what the problem might be and what diagnosis I can
perform?
The output of 'spamassassin --lint -D' might shed some light.
I'm using SA 3.2.5 and sa-update but SA doesn't seem to be picking rules
up from /var/lib/spamassassin/
The rules are present:
-bash-3.2$ ls -Rl1h /var/lib/spamassassin/
/var/lib/spamassassin/:
total 4.0K
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4.0K Jan 2 04:40 3.002005
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.002005:
total 8
16 matches
Mail list logo
