> Starting out with another clean database, further testing
> shows that in fact the message was learned when I ran
> 'spamassassin -r' (though bayes_toks remained at 12288
> bytes), and the same message was learned again when I ran
> 'sa-learn --spam' (and the size once again grew to 24576 bytes)
> -Original Message-
> From: Gary V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 7:56 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Sa-learn --ham vs spamassassin -report
>
> Starting out with another clean database, further testing
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Gary V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 7:56 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Sa-learn --ham vs spamassassin -report
>
> Starting out with another clean database, further testing
> s
I understand. In the test I had an issue with, the database started out (at
least appears to be) empty, I ran 'spamassassin -r' and the size did not
change, then I ran sa-learn, and it did. Certainly not as good a test as
actually checking the contents of the database:
-rw--- 1 amavis ama
Gary V wrote:
> It did work this time. Even with the spamcop error...
>
> sfa:~# su amavis -c 'sa-learn --dump magic'
> 0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
> 0.000 0 7 0 non-token data: nspam
> [...]
>
> sfa:~# su amavis -c 'spama
Gary V wrote:
> It did work this time. Even with the spamcop error...
>
> sfa:~# su amavis -c 'sa-learn --dump magic'
> 0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
> 0.000 0 7 0 non-token data: nspam
> [...]
>
> sfa:~# su amavis -c 'spamas
- Original Message
Subject:
Re: [AMaViS-user] Sa-learn --ham vs spamassassin -report
Date:
Mon, 04 Sep 2006 10:10:24 -0700
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 10:27:55PM -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> > Sa coach sends stream to spamd with 'TELL' protocol.
> > It then calls the equivalent of 'spamassassin -r' (for spam) or '-z
> > for ham' or -f for forget.
> >
> > Do I need to call sa-learn --ham and sa-learn --spam also?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 12:07 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Sa-learn --ham vs spamassassin -report
>
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 10:27:55PM -0400, Michael Scheidel
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 10:27:55PM -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> Sa coach sends stream to spamd with 'TELL' protocol.
> It then calls the equivalent of 'spamassassin -r' (for spam) or '-z for
> ham' or -f for forget.
>
> Do I need to call sa-learn --ham and sa-learn --spam also?
No.
> If I c
I am working an a program that accepts spamassassin 'TELL' (learning)
reports (see the new 'spamassassin coach' for outlook and thunderbird)
Sa coach sends stream to spamd with 'TELL' protocol.
It then calls the equivalent of 'spamassassin -r' (for spam) or '-z for
ham' or -f for forget.
Do I nee
11 matches
Mail list logo
