To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: [sa] Spam Filter Law Suit
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Or tell them to go pound sand. The last Bilski ruling seems to have pretty
> well torpedoed software patents, but some jerks may not have gotten the memo.
Well, I'm not saying this about
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009, Gene Heskett wrote:
Or tell them to go pound sand. The last Bilski ruling seems to have pretty
well torpedoed software patents, but some jerks may not have gotten the memo.
Well, I'm not saying this about anyone in particular, as I don't want to
get sued for defaming any
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 00:56 -0600, LuKreme wrote:
> On Jul 15, 2009, at 3:25 AM, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> > What could be new in "spam filtering" as such in 2003?
>
> The Patent Office is manned by monkeys. Worse, they are ignorant
More than 99% of each patent is old. The question is: Which "
On Jul 15, 2009, at 3:25 AM, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
What could be new in "spam filtering" as such in 2003?
The Patent Office is manned by monkeys. Worse, they are ignorant
monkeys. Have you seen the patent on swinging? Yes, as in the
playground/backyard swing.
--
Sent from my iPhone
On 15/07/09 4:11 PM, "Justin Mason" wrote:
> Hi Damian --
>
> Our first impression: somebody other than us is suing somebody other
> than us about a matter that may be entirely unrelated to anything we
> produce. Unless we have a specific reason to believe that a specific
> patent is likely to
Hi Damian --
Our first impression: somebody other than us is suing somebody other
than us about a matter that may be entirely unrelated to anything we
produce. Unless we have a specific reason to believe that a specific
patent is likely to be enforced against either us or a downstream user
(and,
On Wednesday 15 July 2009, Charles Gregory wrote:
>On Tue, 14 Jul 2009, Damian Mendoza wrote:
>> Anyone else being sued by Southwest Technology Innovations regarding spam
>> filtering? It’s odd that they would name my old company (Workgroup
>> Solutions) since they have very few installations (2 pe
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009, Damian Mendoza wrote:
Anyone else being sued by Southwest Technology Innovations regarding spam
filtering? It’s odd that they would name my old company (Workgroup
Solutions) since they have very few installations (2 person reseller)
compared to the others named. Any opinions
Hi Damian,
The content of this message should not be taken as advice. Please
seek proper legal advice.
At 11:59 14-07-2009, Damian Mendoza wrote:
Anyone else being sued by Southwest Technology Innovations regarding
spam filtering? It's odd that they would name my old company
(Workgroup Solu
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 11:59 -0700, Damian Mendoza wrote:
> Anyone else being sued by Southwest Technology Innovations regarding
> spam filtering? It’s odd that they would name my old company
> (Workgroup Solutions) since they have very few installations (2 person
> reseller) compared to the others
Anyone else being sued by Southwest Technology Innovations regarding spam
filtering? It's odd that they would name my old company (Workgroup Solutions)
since they have very few installations (2 person reseller) compared to the
others named. Any opinions or feedback?
http://www.faqs.org/patents/
11 matches
Mail list logo
