SpamAssassin MX Gateway Server

2006-09-30 Thread Russ B.
I have a unique but interesting problem: I have a farm of servers that use Sendmail/ProcMail/SpamAssassin. Due to their very heavy loads and my custom rules, I have built a dual-proc-dual-core FBSD AMD64 bit OS server to do nothing but my major spam knockdowns and processing to send back to the

Re: SpamAssassin MX Gateway Server

2006-09-30 Thread Russ B.
Fix to above post's last lines: MX server scores it as spam score 200 -- MX server just nukes it MX server scores it as spam score 16 - MX tags it as spam -- sendmail farm just files it in the user's \Caught-Spam folder. MX server scores it as score 7, which is below questionable which is set

Re: SpamAssassin MX Gateway Server

2006-09-30 Thread Jerry Bell
I'm not the authority on such things, but I don't believe it's possible without some customization. I really wanted to ask you, though, how you handle mail rejection on the inner layer of mail servers? If mail gets through your front end SA box and needs to be rejected because it's to an invalid

Re: SpamAssassin MX Gateway Server

2006-09-30 Thread Daniel Staal
--As of September 30, 2006 12:32:41 PM -0500, Russ B. is alleged to have said: Basically, anything that arrives over 15 in score, will have that SPAM-STATUS header embedded, so it does NOT run SpamAssassin on this server, and just puts it in the Caught-Spam. If it has LOWER than a score of 15

Re: SpamAssassin MX Gateway Server

2006-09-30 Thread jdow
From: Daniel Staal [EMAIL PROTECTED] --As of September 30, 2006 12:32:41 PM -0500, Russ B. is alleged to have said: Basically, anything that arrives over 15 in score, will have that SPAM-STATUS header embedded, so it does NOT run SpamAssassin on this server, and just puts it in the