Spamassassin Question -m 20

2007-11-06 Thread Qnet ..
> Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 18:53:07 -0500 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Spamd HIGH LOAD > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > CC: users@spamassassin.apache.org > > Qnet .. wrote: > > I start : > > > > #!/bin/sh > > # spamassassin This script starts and stops the spamd daemon > > # > > > > PATH=$P

Re: SpamAssassin question

2006-10-03 Thread John D. Hardin
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, Justin Mason wrote: > Loren Wilton writes: > > > > I *think* they may have implemented counting rules fairly recently; but I'm > > not sure if that patch was ever released. > > yep, "tflags multiple" support, in 3.2.0. Woohoo! -- John Hardin KA7OHZICQ#15735746http

Re: SpamAssassin question

2006-10-03 Thread Justin Mason
Loren Wilton writes: > You can't do what you want in 2.6x, at least without writing an eval rule in > perl. > > I *think* they may have implemented counting rules fairly recently; but I'm > not sure if that patch was ever released. yep, "tflags multiple" support, in 3.2.0. --j.

RE: SpamAssassin question

2006-10-03 Thread Bowie Bailey
John W Mickevich wrote: > Hello, > > I am relatively new to SpamAssassin and I hope I am asking this > question via the appropriate channel. If not, please let me know. > I have been receiving spam email that is not getting caught by > SpamAssassin and want to add a rule to catch it. These part

RE: SpamAssassin question

2006-10-03 Thread Randal, Phil
eford, UK   From: John W Mickevich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 October 2006 16:12To: users@spamassassin.apache.orgSubject: SpamAssassin question   Hello,   I am relatively new to SpamAssassin and I hope I am asking this question via the appropriate channel

Re: SpamAssassin question

2006-10-03 Thread Loren Wilton
You can't do what you want in 2.6x, at least without writing an eval rule in perl.   I *think* they may have implemented counting rules fairly recently; but I'm not sure if that patch was ever released.   In any case, you should be able to use network tests and SURBL in 2.64 and that will i

SpamAssassin question

2006-10-03 Thread John W Mickevich
  Hello,   I am relatively new to SpamAssassin and I hope I am asking this question via the appropriate channel.  If not, please let me know. I have been receiving spam email that is not getting caught by SpamAssassin and want to add a rule to catch it.  These particular spam emails hav

Re: SpamAssassin Question

2006-06-17 Thread Matt Kettler
slyandjen wrote: > If SpamAssasin is enable > > does it ignore the whitelist/blacklist settings in MailScanner? > MailScanner will still use it's own white/black lists even when SpamAssassin is enabled. It should also be noted that white/black lists, as well as any "spam lists" you enable in Ma

Re: SpamAssassin Question

2006-06-16 Thread Michele Neylon :: Blacknight.ie
slyandjen wrote: > If SpamAssasin is enable > > does it ignore the whitelist/blacklist settings in MailScanner? > > if it does > > where is the whitelist/Blacklist settings That's a MailScanner specific question, so you should really try posting about it on the MailScanner lists -- Mr Mich

SpamAssassin Question

2006-06-16 Thread slyandjen
If SpamAssasin is enable does it ignore the whitelist/blacklist settings in MailScanner? if it does where is the whitelist/Blacklist settings -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SpamAssassin-Question-t1799848.html#a4905321 Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users forum at

Re: SPamAssassin question

2006-06-12 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Slyandjen wrote on Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:21:20 -0700 (PDT): > I fixed the problem today but all I want to know is where is the email > stored if they are not send to the user In the quarantine. -> wiki.mailscanner.info Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Servi

Re: SPamAssassin question

2006-06-12 Thread jdow
email stored if they are not send to the user -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SPamAssassin-question-t1774263.html#a4835608 Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users forum at Nabble.com. You are asking the wrong people. SpamAssassin does not ever store or delete email. The

Re: SPamAssassin question

2006-06-12 Thread slyandjen
this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SPamAssassin-question-t1774263.html#a4835608 Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users forum at Nabble.com.

Re: SPamAssassin question

2006-06-12 Thread Michele Neylon :: Blacknight.ie
Logan Shaw wrote: > On Mon, 12 Jun 2006, slyandjen wrote: >> what is the correct procedure to enable to spam.blacklist file >> I edited a file /etc/ and changed a line >> Is Definitely Spam = %rules-dir%/spam.blacklist.rules >> High Scoring Spam Actions = store >> and then I created a spam.blacklis

Re: SPamAssassin question

2006-06-12 Thread Logan Shaw
to receive the email again This definitely looks like more of a MailScanner question than a SpamAssassin question, which to me means you might want to try asking on the MailScanner mailing list. - Logan

SPamAssassin question

2006-06-12 Thread slyandjen
is the proper step by step to have the blacklist file used and where is the emails that were not delivered to the user while the syntax error was present is there a way to get to them and resend them to the users -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SPamAssassin-question

KMail and spamassassin question

2006-04-29 Thread Spiro Angeli
Hi, I run Gentoo linux and kde 3.5.2 with kmail Currently I have configured and installed SpamAssassin version 3.1.0 I configured SA to run as demone against KMail running as plug-in. So, anytime I receive mail through KMail, SA filters all mail. I have few questions reguarding how SA filters ma