Shane,
From Martin Hepworth:
> In that case, from my understanding of amavis-new, your stuck with the way
> it works. As far as I know amavis-new calls SA from the perl API, like
> MailScanner does.
Exactly, and just like spamd does.
amavisd-new is just like spamd, with different protocols spoke
It takes roughly about a third the time. On the same longish spam
message "spamassassin - Original Message -
From: "shane mullins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: 2005 October, 11, Tuesday 08:17
Subject: Spamassassin vs spamd
Is anyone here running spamd? We use S
Tuesday, October 11, 2005 11:36 AM
Subject: RE: Spamassassin vs spamd
> Shane
>
> In that case, from my understanding of amavis-new, your stuck with the
way
> it works. As far as I know amavis-new calls SA from the perl API, like
> MailScanner does. Best way is to look at why the load i
At 11:17 AM 10/11/2005, you wrote:
Is anyone here running spamd? We use Spamassassin 3.0.4 and several SARE
rules. Now that our primary MX server handles about 20k emails a day, cpu
usage stays over 90 % and load average is between 5 and 6. I was
wondering how much faster spamd is?
spamd
CTED]
Sent: 11 October 2005 16:31
To: Martin Hepworth
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Spamassassin vs spamd
Thanks Martin,
We use amavis-new.
Shane
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Hepworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'shane mullins'&qu
Thanks Martin,
We use amavis-new.
Shane
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Hepworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'shane mullins'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 11:20 AM
Subject: RE: Spamassassin vs spamd
> Shane
shane mullins wrote:
Is anyone here running spamd? We use Spamassassin 3.0.4 and several
SARE rules. Now that our primary MX server handles about 20k emails a
day, cpu usage stays over 90 % and load average is between 5 and 6. I
was wondering how much faster spamd is?
Much, much faster. I
@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Spamassassin vs spamd
Is anyone here running spamd? We use Spamassassin 3.0.4 and several SARE
rules. Now that our primary MX server handles about 20k emails a day, cpu
usage stays over 90 % and load average is between 5 and 6. I was wondering
how much faster spamd is
Is anyone here running spamd? We use
Spamassassin 3.0.4 and several SARE rules. Now that our primary MX server
handles about 20k emails a day, cpu usage stays over 90 % and load average is
between 5 and 6. I was wondering how much faster spamd is?
Thanks
Shane
