On 04/03/11 16:10, Dennis German wrote:
On 3/3/11 10:09 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 03:36 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 15:52 -1000, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
Could we please make an official project statement that 3.2.x is
unsupported and peo
On 3/3/11 10:09 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 03:36 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 15:52 -1000, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
Could we please make an official project statement that 3.2.x is
unsupported and people should really update to 3.3.x?
That s
On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 03:36 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 15:52 -1000, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
> > Could we please make an official project statement that 3.2.x is
> > unsupported and people should really update to 3.3.x?
> That said, personally, with various Open So
Sorry for replying to self.
On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 03:36 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > Could we please make an official project statement that 3.2.x is
> > unsupported and people should really update to 3.3.x?
>
> There is no such decision yet. The 3.2 branch as-is is not unsupported,
> j
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 15:52 -1000, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
> On 3/3/2011 3:06 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > Note though, that your score is on SA 3.3.x, while the OP uses SA 3.2.x.
> > Yes, I can tell this from the scores. :)
> >
> > Major changes between these version are clearly reflected
