On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 15:52 -1000, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
> On 3/3/2011 3:06 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:

> > Note though, that your score is on SA 3.3.x, while the OP uses SA 3.2.x.
> > Yes, I can tell this from the scores. :)
> >
> > Major changes between these version are clearly reflected in your score
> > and rules hit. Namely a lot of work by John Hardin to catch exactly such
> > fraud, and the FreeMail plugin now upstream -- with 3.2 it is available
> > as a third-party plugin.
> 
> Could we please make an official project statement that 3.2.x is 
> unsupported and people should really update to 3.3.x?

There is no such decision yet. The 3.2 branch as-is is not unsupported,
just rather stale. Yes, indeed, there *might* be rule and score fixes
still in the pipe. Less so code, but there definitely are some rule
fixes currently in limbo.

Even with officially dropping support for 3.2, there *still* will be
questions regarding 3.2. You can not stop that with any "official"
announcement. Some folks for whatever reason might be stuck to that
branch.

That said, personally, with various Open Source projects, I have never
given up support for old versions. As long as I *can* help people, I
will.

  guenther


-- 
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}

Reply via email to