...
To: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: List Mail User [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: URI Tests and Japanese Chars (solved)
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason)
Justin,
Daryl C. W
...
Subject: RE: URI Tests and Japanese Chars (solved)
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 17:41:03 -0500
...
From: Rose, Bobby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Daryl C. W. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: List Mail User [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
users@spamassassin.apache.org
List Mail User wrote:
(B...
(BTo: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(BCc: List Mail User [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
(B users@spamassassin.apache.org
(BSubject: Re: URI Tests and Japanese Chars (solved)
(BIn-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(BFrom: [EMAIL
[all sipped]
Since you mentioned the scores, please note the Bobby Rose, the original
poster of this issue had modified the score for URIBL_SBL from its
defaults to 10 ...
I had suggested that he reduce the score (possibly setting it back to
the defaults)
While it doesn't negate the issues
On Wednesday, March 16, 2005, 12:29:41 PM, List User wrote:
(Jeff C wrote:)
uridnsbl used in the default rule URIBL_SBL does check domain
name servers against SBL, but I'm kind of surprised to hear it
triggering on email addresses. It should definitely be
checking web
sites and the like. Can
Jeff,
RFC 1630 make pretty clear that a email address in either a mailto:;
or cid:; clause *is* a URI. It does not address whether a bare email address
would count (it seems that it doesn't fit the RFC definition, but does fit
some other I found by Goggle).
I could be
List Mail User wrote:
Jeff,
RFC 1630 make pretty clear that a email address in either a mailto:;
or cid:; clause *is* a URI. It does not address whether a bare email address
would count (it seems that it doesn't fit the RFC definition, but does fit
some other I found by Goggle).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daryl C. W. O'Shea writes:
List Mail User wrote:
Jeff,
RFC 1630 make pretty clear that a email address in either a mailto:;
or cid:; clause *is* a URI. It does not address whether a bare email
address
would count (it seems
the more that person's
email address appears in the email.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 5:26 PM
To: Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Cc: List Mail User; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: URI Tests
Rose, Bobby wrote:
But in my test messages the email address wasn't in the form of a URI.
It was just the email address. I even used pine for a test to make sure
it was a gui client doing some reformatting business.
Sorry, I shouldn't have said URI. I had said URI since SpamAssassin
internally
On Thursday, March 17, 2005, 2:25:34 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea writes:
List Mail User wrote:
Jeff,
RFC 1630 make pretty clear that a email address in either a mailto:;
or cid:; clause *is* a URI. It does not address whether a bare email
address
would
Rose, Bobby wrote:
I have a user that is of Japanese origin and who converses with other
individuals in Japan in his same field of study. The messages they send
are in Japanese and trip the URI_SBL rule. These people are in
different .jp domains and I really don't want to get into the
.
Any idea on how to limit the scope to just the URI at it's face value?
-Original Message-
From: Rose, Bobby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 2:14 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: URI Tests and Japanese Chars
I have a user that is of Japanese origin
On Wednesday, March 16, 2005, 3:55:52 AM, Bobby Rose wrote:
I figured out the problem, it' was the an individuals email address in
the message body (even though not a mailto). Their email domain isn't
listed at spamhaus.org but it turns out one of their ISPs DNS servers
are which they are
14 AM
(BSubject: Re: $BFb;[EMAIL PROTECTED](J
(B
(B***
(B
(B-=B
(B
(B
(B-Original Message-
(BFrom: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(BSent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 7:52 AM
(BTo: users@spamassassin.apache.org
(BSubject: Re: URI Tests and Japanese Chars (solved)
(B
(BOn
On Wednesday, March 16, 2005, 5:47:40 AM, Bobby Rose wrote:
This is an excerpt that I used in trying to track it down. No
real mailto URI unless there is some translation going on with
email addresses embedded in the body by the email client on send. At
first, I just thought it might be a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bobby, could you open a bug in the bugzilla about this? URI rules
should not be checking mailto links.
- --j.
Jeff Chan writes:
On Wednesday, March 16, 2005, 5:47:40 AM, Bobby Rose wrote:
This is an excerpt that I used in trying to track it
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 7:52 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: URI Tests and Japanese Chars (solved)
On Wednesday, March 16, 2005, 3:55:52 AM, Bobby Rose wrote:
I figured out the problem
I have a user that is of Japanese origin and who converses with other
individuals in Japan in his same field of study. The messages they send
are in Japanese and trip the URI_SBL rule. These people are in
different .jp domains and I really don't want to get into the
administrative overhead of
19 matches
Mail list logo
