.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: Kelson Vibber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: 2005 January, 19, Wednesday 09:14
Subject: Re: Verizon hosting spammers :)
This was sent to me off-list. It's an interesting look at the
implications of doing callbacks:
Rich Kulawiec
: Verizon hosting spammers :)
This was sent to me off-list. It's an interesting look at the
implications of doing callbacks:
Rich Kulawiec wrote:
If you wouldn't mind forwarding this back to the list (your message
was forwarded to me off-list)...
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 09:25
From: Justin Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
jdow writes:
This probably explains the massive runs of emails with nothing in them
that fetchmail is failing on when it attempts to drag them from
NG_Popper.
I guess simply dropping Verizon on the
jdow wrote:
This probably explains the massive runs of emails with nothing in them
that fetchmail is failing on when it attempts to drag them from NG_Popper.
Maybe. Standard practice on these seems to be to drop the connection
before the transaction is finished, so in *theory* the mail should
: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: 2005 January, 17, Monday 01:37
Subject: Re: Verizon hosting spammers :)
It's true, Verizon have apparently blocked all email from RIPE, APNIC
allocated addresses (Europe and Asia Pac) starting Dec 22 2004.
Apparently MessageLabs took 2 whole days to get
.html
-Original Message-
From: jdow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 4:32 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Verizon hosting spammers :)
And now Verison is sending out spam to get people to join verison.com.
They are going into my black list
Hey now, you all. I have a Verizon address, and to the best of my ability,
unless I set up SSH tunneling through them, I cannot send mail from any
other
account than mine.
And don't blacklist me!
Rob
You have sent this mail to the list through out014pub.verizon.net and not
directly from
On 2005-01-18, at 08.49, Menno van Bennekom wrote:
You have sent this mail to the list through out014pub.verizon.net and
not
directly from your own dsl-verizon.net address so you wouldn't have
been
blocked by me ;)
I was _hammered_ all throughout last year by messages to unknown
accounts from
Menno van Bennekom wrote:
You have sent this mail to the list through out014pub.verizon.net and not
directly from your own dsl-verizon.net address so you wouldn't have been
blocked by me ;)
Menno
Alas, I'm moving to a Verizon business DSL account for my server. Is
there any distinction between
Menno van Bennekom wrote:
Mojo wrote:
Alas, I'm moving to a Verizon business DSL account for my server. Is
there any distinction between residential DSL and business DSL in their
network addresses?
I don't know but my postfix check on dsl-verizon.net is based on DNS not
on ip-address. So if you
j o a r wrote:
I was _hammered_ all throughout last year by messages to unknown
accounts from machines in the sc0nnpub.verizon.net segment (nn = 01 -
99). Eventually I had to blacklist anything matching that pattern. Seems
to be a lot more quiet now though.
Actually, I suspect those are
Huh. Reverse DNS on my business DSL line from Verizon comes out as
bdsl.66.15.96.103.gte.net
(One thing I've asked their tech is if they would delegate reverse DNS
to my name server, but the tech had no idea what I was talking about.
I'll try again later ...)
Ditto for Conversent :/
--Chris
Yes, I think they host a lot of spammers.
I only get spam/virus mails from Verizon here (Netherlands) so I blocked
dsl-verizon.net in postfix and it that means about 100 spams/viruses less
per day. If they want to sent real mail they still can do so through the
smtp-servers of their provider.
It's true, Verizon have apparently blocked all email from RIPE, APNIC
allocated addresses (Europe and Asia Pac) starting Dec 22 2004.
Apparently MessageLabs took 2 whole days to get onto their whitelist.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/01/14/verizon_email_block/
D'oh...
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr
Martin Hepworth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote on 01/17/2005 03:37:10 AM:
It's true, Verizon have apparently blocked all email from RIPE, APNIC
allocated addresses (Europe and Asia Pac) starting Dec 22 2004.
Apparently MessageLabs took 2 whole days to get onto their whitelist.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Hepworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 4:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Verizon hosting spammers :)
It's true, Verizon have apparently blocked all email from RIPE, APNIC
allocated
On Monday 17 January 2005 7:34 am, Andy Jezierski wrote:
Martin Hepworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/17/2005
03:37:10 AM:
It's true, Verizon have apparently blocked all email from RIPE, APNIC
allocated addresses (Europe and Asia Pac) starting Dec 22 2004.
Apparently MessageLabs took 2
On Friday, January 14, 2005, 3:26:35 PM, Alex Broens wrote:
Chris Santerre wrote:
Brief header I'm not too interested in.
HTML code showing verizon site. Should we block all mysite pages? /sniker/
a DEFANGED_Onmouseover=window.status='See Your Savings!';return true;
On Friday, January 14, 2005, 2:13:27 PM, Chris Santerre wrote:
HTML code showing verizon site. Should we block all mysite pages? /sniker/
a DEFANGED_Onmouseover=window.status='See Your Savings!';return true;
href=http://mysite.verizon.net/resoxfmz/1.htm;img border=0
Jeff Chan wrote:
On Friday, January 14, 2005, 3:26:35 PM, Alex Broens wrote:
Chris Santerre wrote:
Brief header I'm not too interested in.
HTML code showing verizon site. Should we block all mysite pages? /sniker/
a DEFANGED_Onmouseover=window.status='See Your Savings!';return true;
HTML code showing verizon site. Should we block all mysite pages? /sniker/
a onmouseover=window.status='See Your Savings!';return true;
Personally I block anything that I can find a window.status= in. They are
all phish as near as I can tell.
Loren
--On Saturday, January 15, 2005 6:25 AM -0800 Loren Wilton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally I block anything that I can find a window.status= in. They
are all phish as near as I can tell.
No false positives? If not, you might enter a bugzilla to get it entered as
an official rule. I'd love
Chris Santerre wrote:
Brief header I'm not too interested in.
HTML code showing verizon site. Should we block all mysite pages? /sniker/
a onmouseover=window.status='See Your Savings!';return true;
href=http://mysite.verizon.net/resoxfmz/1.htm;img border=0
23 matches
Mail list logo
