Hi (Holã),
This is how I try to manage spam:
Bayes:
---
- I have a local folder located on the LAN where people of my company
can put ".eml" or mbox spam/ham files ( actually I am the only one
doing it because others users use M* Outlook).
- Every hour a cron script uploads all these fil
On 5/20/07, night duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But i have a problem if i want to move all the spam messages to each spam
folder of each user i must touch each .qmail and create one .procmailrc for
each user.
Nope, you can use maildrop and create a single mailfilter rule. Place
it in the .qm
I must told that i'm a little bit lost with spam...
I have some doubts about spam...and fighting it...
If i have a mail server what is the best idea for spam mails that are
detected to keep them into the inbox of each user or to move them to each spam
folder of each user?
But i
Matthew Newton a écrit :
70_sare_specific.cf
Sorry, that's too cryptic for me to understand.
Are you trying to say that I should be using that ruleset (I am),
that the OP should be (they are), or something else?
As far as I can tell, he is saying the OP should use that rule or at
leas
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 05:59:22AM -0700, jdow wrote:
> From: "Matthew Newton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 08:57:44PM +0200, Jon Kvebaek wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>we are currently receiving a lot of mail like the one listed beneath. No
> >>rules seem to hit it at all, and it gets a l
From: "Matthew Newton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 08:57:44PM +0200, Jon Kvebaek wrote:
Hi,
we are currently receiving a lot of mail like the one listed beneath. No
rules seem to hit it at all, and it gets a low negative score. Does
anyone have any ideas on how to deal with this
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 08:57:44PM +0200, Jon Kvebaek wrote:
> Hi,
> we are currently receiving a lot of mail like the one listed beneath. No
> rules seem to hit it at all, and it gets a low negative score. Does
> anyone have any ideas on how to deal with this (except that I could
> make some rules
Jon Kvebaek wrote:
> Hi,
> we are currently receiving a lot of mail like the one listed beneath. No
> rules seem to hit it at all, and it gets a low negative score. Does
> anyone have any ideas on how to deal with this (except that I could
> make some rules punishing the occurence of wristwatches o
