> Rick Knight writes:
>
> > -0.0 DKIM_VERIFIED Domain Keys Identified Mail: signature
> > passes verification
> > 0.0 DKIM_SIGNEDDomain Keys Identified Mail: message has a
> > signature
On 23.01.10 15:46, Greg Troxel wrote:
> I supsect this isn't your issue, but I have been
On Sat, 2010-01-23 at 20:32 +, Mike Cardwell wrote:
> On 23/01/2010 20:25, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>
> > Store user linked whitelist URLs in a relational database. Use an SA
> > plugin to apply them. Provide a GUI tool with a really simple interface
> > to allow users to maintain their own whit
Rick Knight writes:
> -0.0 DKIM_VERIFIED Domain Keys Identified Mail: signature
> passes verification
> 0.0 DKIM_SIGNEDDomain Keys Identified Mail: message has a
> signature
I supsect this isn't your issue, but I have been finding that DKIM
signature often fail to validate
On 23/01/2010 20:25, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>> The only thing I can picture, technically, is a kind of auto-whitelist, or
>> a user-specified whitelist.
>>
>> The former is subject to various pitfalls, as I've already experienced on
>> my system, and the latter, even though available to the user
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 13:57 -0500, Charles Gregory wrote:
> The only thing I can picture, technically, is a kind of auto-whitelist, or
> a user-specified whitelist.
>
> The former is subject to various pitfalls, as I've already experienced on
> my system, and the latter, even though available to
Mike Cardwell wrote:
On 22/01/2010 04:05, Matt Kettler wrote:
Alex, if whitelist_from doesn't work, whitelist_from_rcvd won't either.
That's *more* restrictive, not less.
Rick, if you've been using "users@spamassassin.apache.org" try using
*...@spamassassin.apache.org instead. If you've got en
Mike Cardwell wrote:
On 22/01/2010 04:05, Matt Kettler wrote:
Alex, if whitelist_from doesn't work, whitelist_from_rcvd won't either.
That's *more* restrictive, not less.
Rick, if you've been using "users@spamassassin.apache.org" try using
*...@spamassassin.apache.org instead. If you've got en
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, LuKreme wrote:
: You shouldn't be sending ANY mailinglists through SpamAssassin.
On 22.01.10 09:49, Charles Gregory wrote:
Say what? And how exactly do you propose to do that for hundreds of users,
any of whom could be subs
> On 22.01.10 09:49, Charles Gregory wrote:
[...]
On 22.01.10 19:28, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> Btw Have I already asked you for using something standard ('>') for quoting?
ops, I did, you did, just in another thread I read later. Sorry
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://w
> On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, LuKreme wrote:
> : You shouldn't be sending ANY mailinglists through SpamAssassin.
On 22.01.10 09:49, Charles Gregory wrote:
> Say what? And how exactly do you propose to do that for hundreds of users,
> any of whom could be subscribed to many different lists? Far too much
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, LuKreme wrote:
: You shouldn't be sending ANY mailinglists through SpamAssassin.
Say what? And how exactly do you propose to do that for hundreds of users,
any of whom could be subscribed to many different lists? Far too much for
any manual system (presuming you could even g
On 22/01/2010 04:05, Matt Kettler wrote:
Alex, if whitelist_from doesn't work, whitelist_from_rcvd won't either.
That's *more* restrictive, not less.
Rick, if you've been using "users@spamassassin.apache.org" try using
*...@spamassassin.apache.org instead. If you've got envelope FROM headers
ad
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 09:08:05PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
> You shouldn't be sending ANY mailinglists through SpamAssassin.
Why not? A lot of mailing lists are used by spammers.
Regards
Johann
--
Johann Spies Telefoon: 021-808 4599
Informasietegnologie, Universiteit van Stellenbosch
On 21-Jan-2010, at 22:25, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Fri 22 Jan 2010 05:08:05 AM CET, LuKreme wrote
>
>> On Jan 21, 2010, at 20:24, Rick Knight wrote:
>>> I belong to several mailing lists and newsgroups. Messages from one
>>> particular list is almost always marked as spam by spamassassin.
>>
On Fri 22 Jan 2010 05:08:05 AM CET, LuKreme wrote
On Jan 21, 2010, at 20:24, Rick Knight wrote:
I belong to several mailing lists and newsgroups. Messages from one
particular list is almost always marked as spam by spamassassin.
You shouldn't be sending ANY mailinglists through SpamAssassin
Hi,
>> Try whitelist_from_rcvd instead:
>>
>> http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html
> Alex, if whitelist_from doesn't work, whitelist_from_rcvd won't either.
> That's *more* restrictive, not less.
Yes, good point, thanks. I didn't think he was using any of the
On Jan 21, 2010, at 20:24, Rick Knight wrote:
I belong to several mailing lists and newsgroups. Messages from one
particular list is almost always marked as spam by spamassassin.
You shouldn't be sending ANY mailinglists through SpamAssassin.
On 1/21/2010 10:46 PM, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>> I belong to several mailing lists and newsgroups. Messages from one
>> particular list is almost always marked as spam by spamassassin. I've tried
>> to whitelist this group but the from header matches the address of the
>> original message sender,
Hi,
> I belong to several mailing lists and newsgroups. Messages from one
> particular list is almost always marked as spam by spamassassin. I've tried
> to whitelist this group but the from header matches the address of the
> original message sender, not the group address. Is there a way to white
I belong to several mailing lists and newsgroups. Messages from one
particular list is almost always marked as spam by spamassassin. I've
tried to whitelist this group but the from header matches the address of
the original message sender, not the group address. Is there a way to
whitelist on t
20 matches
Mail list logo
