At 04:23 PM 3/2/2005, Jim Maul wrote:
First, why doubt Matt? :)
I could write at least a 1000 page novel of good reasons to doubt me :)
Secondly, what would the second parameter be? If the first is the
required hits, the second number would be?
That's a lot more sensible..
> At 01:08 PM 3/2/2005, you wrote:
>
> >Can anyone confirm that it should only have one parameter?
>
> Yup, the manual can.. :)
>
>
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Con
f.
> html
>
> > I can't image why it would have two?
>
> A mistake when someone (not to
Jon Dossey wrote:
At 11:25 AM 3/2/2005, Jon Dossey wrote:
I apologize, I was in a rush. System is redhat fc2, sendmail 8.13.1,
spamassassin 3.0.1 and spamass-milter 0.2.0 (updated for SA 3.0,
haven't
switched to 0.3.0 yet).
Here's (most of) my /home/spamd/.spamassassin/user_prefs:
# How many poin
At 01:08 PM 3/2/2005, you wrote:
Can anyone confirm that it should only have one parameter?
Yup, the manual can.. :)
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html
I can't image why it would have two?
A mistake when someone (not to name names) was editing it perhap
> At 11:25 AM 3/2/2005, Jon Dossey wrote:
> >I apologize, I was in a rush. System is redhat fc2, sendmail 8.13.1,
> >spamassassin 3.0.1 and spamass-milter 0.2.0 (updated for SA 3.0,
haven't
> >switched to 0.3.0 yet).
> >
> >Here's (most of) my /home/spamd/.spamassassin/user_prefs:
>
>
>
> ># Ho
At 11:25 AM 3/2/2005, Jon Dossey wrote:
I apologize, I was in a rush. System is redhat fc2, sendmail 8.13.1,
spamassassin 3.0.1 and spamass-milter 0.2.0 (updated for SA 3.0, haven't
switched to 0.3.0 yet).
Here's (most of) my /home/spamd/.spamassassin/user_prefs:
# How many points before a mail i
being tagged. The
only thing that seemed different about it was that it was flagged as
"Urgent".
Thanks,
.jon
> -Original Message-
> From: Evan Platt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 10:19 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Why w
At 08:13 AM 3/2/2005, you wrote:
It scored a 5.8 out of a required 5.0, but the message wasn't tagged.
Any ideas why?
My guess is people here would need to know the contents of your local
config to know why. My guess is an incorrect setting.
It scored a 5.8 out of a required 5.0, but the message wasn't tagged.
Any ideas why?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "VB LOTTERY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WINNER" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: BANK GIRO LOTTERJ WINNING ANNOUNCEMENT
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 10:28:01 +0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Conte
