On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, RW wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 09:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin wrote:
Think MSFT's annoying "smart quotes" converting a single typed
apostrophe within a word into a Unicode right single quote so that it
Looks Good.
I feel it's a
On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, RW wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 09:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin wrote:
Think MSFT's annoying "smart quotes" converting a single typed
apostrophe within a word into a Unicode right single quote so that it
Looks Good.
I feel it's a valid issue, and the fix is checked in
On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 09:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin wrote:
> Think MSFT's annoying "smart quotes" converting a single typed
> apostrophe within a word into a Unicode right single quote so that it
> Looks Good.
>
> I feel it's a valid issue, and the fix is checked in (at least for
> one flavor
On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, RW wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 16:12:30 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019, Olivier Coutu wrote:
https://regex101.com/r/SUqMxn/1/
I understand that a single quote should be used when
writing /won't/, but it's probably not the first time __YOU_WON_01
hits
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 16:12:30 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jun 2019, Olivier Coutu wrote:
>
> > https://regex101.com/r/SUqMxn/1/
> >
> > I understand that a single quote should be used when
> > writing /won't/, but it's probably not the first time __YOU_WON_01
> > hits on /won’t/
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019, Olivier Coutu wrote:
https://regex101.com/r/SUqMxn/1/
I understand that a single quote should be used when writing /won't/, but
it's probably not the first time __YOU_WON_01 hits on /won’t/ with a right
single quotation mark.
Apparently this can happen automatically in
On 10 Jun 2019, at 14:43, Olivier Coutu wrote:
https://regex101.com/r/SUqMxn/1/
I understand that a single quote should be used when writing /won't/,
but it's probably not the first time __YOU_WON_01 hits on /won’t/
with a right single quotation mark.
Apparently this can happen
On Jun 10, 2019, at 12:43 PM, Olivier Coutu wrote:
> I would suggest a second negative lookahead to correct the issue.
If the rule doesn’t hit enough spam, the score goes down. It doesn’t matter if
it’s esoterically correct or not.
--
If it wasn't for the pirates, I bet Star Wars: Ep III
https://regex101.com/r/SUqMxn/1/
I understand that a single quote should be used when writing /won't/,
but it's probably not the first time __YOU_WON_01 hits on /won’t/ with a
right single quotation mark.
Apparently this can happen automatically in certain text editors when
there are two
