subject:"back where I was\: why is this rule misfiring\?"

Re: back where I was: why is this rule misfiring?

2005-03-23 Thread Loren Wilton

> What is going on here? Good question. > So why does spamd say that > Vicki Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> !~ /(?:[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL > PROTECTED])\.com/i > > I ran this through vanilla Perl and > Vicki Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> =~ /(?:[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL > PROTECTED])\.com/i I ran b

Re: back where I was: why is this rule misfiring?

2005-03-23 Thread alan premselaar

Vicki Brown wrote: What is going on here? The rule header CF_NOT_FOR_METoCc !~ /(?:[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED])\.com/i score CF_NOT_FOR_ME 0.01 describe CF_NOT_FOR_ME Neither To nor Cc me Vicki, You're using a negated OR test, you want to use a negated A

back where I was: why is this rule misfiring?

2005-03-23 Thread Vicki Brown

What is going on here? The rule header CF_NOT_FOR_METoCc !~ /(?:[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED])\.com/i score CF_NOT_FOR_ME 0.01 describe CF_NOT_FOR_ME Neither To nor Cc me The mail Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.