Re: connection to spamd refused...

2004-12-13 Thread Parker Morse
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Dec 10, 2004, at 2:39 PM, Andy Norris wrote: Sorry to bother again, but I feel we must be getting closer... This in the logs (/var/log/maillog) now...(!) Dec 10 13:44:40 tireswing spamc[22597]: connect() to spamd at 127.0.0.1 failed, retrying (1/3):

Re: connection to spamd refused...

2004-12-11 Thread Mike Burger
If MailScanner is set up to use spamassassin, then it normally wouldn't be using spamc. However, if spamd is not running, spamc can't connect to it. spamc = client spamd = daemon On Fri, 10 Dec 2004, Andy Norris wrote: > > My understanding is that spamd should not be running when spamassassin

Re: connection to spamd refused...

2004-12-10 Thread Andy Norris
My understanding is that spamd should not be running when spamassassin is used in conjunction with MailScanner as MailScanner uses spamassassin directly, and not as a daemon? So is this a MailScanner issue, then? Thanks Mike, Andy At 01:44 pm 2004-12-10, you wrote: Is spamd running? On Fri, 10 D

Re: connection to spamd refused...

2004-12-10 Thread Mike Burger
Is spamd running? On Fri, 10 Dec 2004, Andy Norris wrote: > > Sorry to bother again, but I feel we must be getting closer... > > This in the logs (/var/log/maillog) now...(!) > > Dec 10 13:44:40 tireswing spamc[22597]: connect() to spamd at 127.0.0.1 > failed, retrying (1/3): Connection refus

connection to spamd refused...

2004-12-10 Thread Andy Norris
Sorry to bother again, but I feel we must be getting closer... This in the logs (/var/log/maillog) now...(!) Dec 10 13:44:40 tireswing spamc[22597]: connect() to spamd at 127.0.0.1 failed, retrying (1/3): Connection refused Dec 10 13:44:41 tireswing spamc[22597]: connect() to spamd at 127.0.0.1 f