On Wed, 25 May 2005 16:13:45 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff wrote:
On Tuesday, May 24, 2005, 6:56:08 AM, Ronan McGlue wrote:
I added a dummy mx record (lowest preference) as we all know its
generally the one th spammers target first, which is getting hit
with about 50% of our daily
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I added a dummy mx record (lowest preference) as we all know its
generally the one th spammers target first, which is getting hit with
about 50% of our daily connections, of which i defer all of them at a
very low overhead.
May I ask what kind of
I added a dummy mx record (lowest preference) as we all know its
generally the one th spammers target first, which is getting hit with
about 50% of our daily connections, of which i defer all of them at a
very low overhead.
May I ask what kind of software/settings do you use to defer the
On Tuesday, May 24, 2005, 6:56:08 AM, Ronan McGlue wrote:
I added a dummy mx record (lowest preference) as we all know its
generally the one th spammers target first, which is getting hit with
about 50% of our daily connections, of which i defer all of them at a
very low overhead.
Some of
Do you have any links to linux based fake proxypots ?
They sound cool, or maybe its just fun to say...
Look for implementations of Teergrube on google.
A famous one which shut down awhile back is LaBrea - which uses similar
technology for catching worms.
There is a Linux netfilter plugin
On Wednesday, May 25, 2005, 5:43:41 PM, evan wrote:
Also look at honeyd.org for how honeypots are catching spammers.
Spamhaus uses
a similar scheme where unknown and unused domains sit on servers across the
world. Any mail the server gets is obviously spam since no one should be
sending an
