On Friday 09 August 2013 00:26:09 Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> Ok, so I imagine I want to do something like:
>
> header DKIM_ADSP_DISCARD eval:check_dkim_adsp('D')
>
> but only for facebook.com... I don't see exactly how I tie those two
> together?
==
To add POSITIVE spam score
From: LuKreme
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:23:23 -0700
I'm adding address book users into the user_prefs files, but without
the signing domain this is useless and emails for my users are still
getting tagged up as spam (these in particular score 7-10 points
without the whitelist).
On Wednesday 16 December 2009 16:23:23 LuKreme wrote:
> Given the following header:
>
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; d=bluehornet.com; s=bluehornet-1.bh;
> c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i...@bluehornet.com; t=1258661618;
> h=From:Subject:X-Outgoing:Date;
> bh=3HPqQ2/9JeqpKI5xZpBSBX
On ons 16 dec 2009 16:23:23 CET, LuKreme wrote
whitelist_from_dkim *...@buffetsinc.com bluehornet.com
the correct syntax for whitelisting these emails?
syntax is ok, but
i would not use whitelist_from_dkim with a willcard domain, imho its better to
def_whitelist_from_dkim *...@buffetsinc.com
Given the following header:
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; d=bluehornet.com; s=bluehornet-1.bh;
c=relaxed/simple;
q=dns/txt; i...@bluehornet.com; t=1258661618;
h=From:Subject:X-Outgoing:Date;
bh=3HPqQ2/9JeqpKI5xZpBSBX0GumA=;
b=XpEFvxW0dFfl5OlV5dHIU8Ni6rwDsdZc6VtH
Hi Mark,
At 11:18 18-06-2007, Mark Martinec wrote:
For completeness, here are my current rules to add few score
points to yahoo and gmail mail which fails verification:
header __L_ML1 Precedence =~ m{\b(list|bulk)\b}i
It's funny, I created similar rules a few weeks back. :-) I'm still
With the PayPal transitioning its service for European customers
from UK to Luxemburg, it is beginning to use new sending address,
which may not be in people's whitelist, so here is my update
to facilitate legitimate PayPal mail reaching its customers
(I'm including ebay entries for good measure):
