> On 22 Oct 2014, at 20:39 , John Hardin wrote:
>
> On Wed, 22 Oct 2014, LuKreme wrote:
>
>> Thanks, the questions help me focus on what is really happening.
>
> Happy to help.
Aha. It was procmail. but it was /usr/local/etc/procmailrc
:0c
/backups/imap.backups
if that FAILS, the duplicate
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014, LuKreme wrote:
Thanks, the questions help me focus on what is really happening.
Happy to help.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 64
> On 22 Oct 2014, at 19:38 , John Hardin wrote:
>
> On Wed, 22 Oct 2014, LuKreme wrote:
>
>> I am seeing duplicate emails when saved off into my Maildirs. My normal mail
>> application ignores these duplicates, but iOS 8 does not, so I need to
>> figure out what
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014, LuKreme wrote:
I am seeing duplicate emails when saved off into my Maildirs. My normal
mail application ignores these duplicates, but iOS 8 does not, so I need
to figure out what's going on.
1412808979.M904650P22299.mail.covisp.net,S=65189,W=66526:2,S
14128
I am seeing duplicate emails when saved off into my Maildirs. My normal mail
application ignores these duplicates, but iOS 8 does not, so I need to figure
out what's going on.
1412808979.M904650P22299.mail.covisp.net,S=65189,W=66526:2,S
1412808979.M904651P22299.mail.covisp.net,S=65
rned -1!
> recovering: Bad file descriptor
> @4000470286130119075c [19049] warn: prefork: select returned -1!
> recovering: Bad file descriptor
> @40004702861401b49f64 [19049] warn: prefork: select returned -1!
> recovering: Bad file descriptor
> @400047028615024b1ad4 [19049]
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Steve Ingraham wrote:
> Most of the new spam is very raw adult sex spam emails some with
> pictures in the body of the text.
Images, huh? Have they passed the spamc message size limit and aren't
being scanned at all?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Duplicate emails and increased spam
getting through
I have a couple of problems that had shown up about a month ago
and now are showing up again yesterday and today in our domain. Many of
my users are reporting quite a few duplicate emails and
I have a couple of problems that had shown up about a month ago and now
are showing up again yesterday and today in our domain. Many of my
users are reporting quite a few duplicate emails and many are receiving
a great number of spam emails that they were not receiving before.
We are running
27;t recall what the usual fix is to solve this problem.
I
>don't think it is causing your duplicate emails, but there is a minor
nit
>there that is probably making AWL not work right.
Thanks for the information Loren, it appears that email is delivering
normally again. I definitely
ve this problem. I
don't think it is causing your duplicate emails, but there is a minor nit
there that is probably making AWL not work right.
Loren
d). I have create a perl script to filter those emails.
Francois Rousseau2006/9/28, Steve Ingraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Mark Adams wrote:What is your exchange server hosting? pop3? I have noted problems beforewith clients recieving duplicate emails when connections timeout and theserver does n
Mark Adams wrote:
What is your exchange server hosting? pop3? I have noted problems before
with clients recieving duplicate emails when connections timeout and the
server does not know how far the client application has gone through
the download of the mailbox - causing it to start downloading
r exchange server hosting? pop3? I have noted problems before
with clients recieving duplicate emails when connections timeout and the
server does not know how far the client application has gone through
the download of the mailbox - causing it to start downloading again. Are
any of the clients r
Jake Vickers wrote:
Steve, in looking at what I
was doing late last night, I did not specify the port for the telnet
connection. It was my outbound firewall that was causing the no route to host.
Apologize for this.
If email is working now, keep an eye on it. Are
all of your clients se
Matt Kettler wrote:
>First, I'd have Jake try his telnet again, but this time use port 25 to
>connect to: (note the extra 25 on the end)
>telnet 204.87.111.225 25
>*I* can do this just fine. I get back:
>220 dellapp02.occa.state.ok.us ESMTP
>Jake should to. If he can't, the problem isn't in yo
Steve Ingraham wrote:
>
> I want to thank Jake, Andrew, George, Eric, Loren, Jimmy and anyone
> else who has sent information to help me with my email problems the
> last couple of days. Despite all of your good advice our domain is
> still having email problems. I am not exactly sure what the root
Steve Ingraham wrote:
mail.okcca.net. 21592 IN A 204.87.111.225
;; Query time: 2 msec
;; SERVER: 216.55.144.5#53(216.55.144.5)
;; WHEN: Wed Sep 27 21:16:14 2006
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 48
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# telnet 204.87.111.225
Trying 204.87.111.225...
telnet: connect
Loren Wilton wrote:
>occa_phishing.cf
>occa_replica.cf
>I have no knowledge of these.
>From the rules you show these aren't particularly worthwhile (nor all
that
>well written rules). There are a number of SARE rules that cover this
area
>much more thoroughly, and I believe these days
Hi,
have a look at rulesemporium.com
There are descriptions of the rules, and definitely you should use only
one out pof each set
of similar named ones
Wolfgang Hamann
Be careful there. It depends on what you mean by "similarly named".
It is perfectly valid to have
70_sare_html0.cf
70_sa
occa_phishing.cf
occa_replica.cf
I have no knowledge of these.
From the rules you show these aren't particularly worthwhile (nor all that
well written rules). There are a number of SARE rules that cover this area
much more thoroughly, and I believe these days even a number of standar
Hi,
have a look at rulesemporium.com
There are descriptions of the rules, and definitely you should use only one out
pof each set
of similar named ones
Wolfgang Hamann
>> 70_sare_evilnum1.cf
>> 70_sare_evilnum2.cf
>> 70_sare_header0.cf
>> 70_sare_header.cf
>> 70_sare_header_eng.cf
>> 70_sare_ht
>sa-blacklist.cf
>sa-blacklist.current.uri.cf
>Get rid of these! They are evil and probably the root of your problem!
> (They are also long depreciated and very out of date, so wouldn't be
doing
>much even if they didn't kill your system.)
I have removed those from /etc/mail/spamassass
essage -
From: "Steve Ingraham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ; ;
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 6:47 AM
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] duplicate emails
Jdow wrote:
Steve, it might help if you listed which rule sets. There are some
which are obscenely large and others that
n filtering. An interesting note
I have observed but do not understand why it is happening. When I
updated the rules on Monday, many users started seeing an increase
number of spam in their mailboxes. One user who was getting a great
deal of duplicate emails was also seeing a huge increase in t
I need help with a problem. Our users are seeing some multiple
duplicate emails coming from the same sender. This is not occurring
with every email so there does not seem to be any pattern to which
incoming emails will be duplicated and which ones won't. They are also
reporting that duplicate
need help with a problem. Our users are seeing some multiple
duplicate emails coming from the same sender. This is not occurring
with every email so there does not seem to be any pattern to which
incoming emails will be duplicated and which ones won't. They are also
reporting that duplicate
I want to thank
everyone who posted a reply on my inquiry. I believe Jake Vickers was
right about the problem. The RAM on the email server was bogged down since
yesterday when I updated the various .cf files using rules_du_jour. I had
included just a handful of rules from RDJ but it appea
Steve Ingraham wrote:
If anyone has a simple way of updating rules for spamassassin I would
welcome your input. I still need to update the rules as I have been
getting a great number of emails coming through to users. Specifically,
we are getting a lot of the pharmaceutical spam and the stoc
Steve Ingraham wrote:
I need help with a
problem. Our users are seeing some multiple duplicate emails coming from
the same sender. This is not occurring with every email so there does not
seem to be any pattern to which incoming emails will be duplicated and which
ones won’t. They
SM wrote:
At 08:53 26-09-2006, Steve Ingraham wrote:
I need help with a problem. Our users are seeing some multiple
duplicate emails coming from the same sender. This is not occurring
with every email so there does not seem to be any pattern to which
incoming emails will be duplicated and
At 08:53 26-09-2006, Steve Ingraham wrote:
I need help with a problem. Our users are seeing some multiple
duplicate emails coming from the same sender. This is not occurring
with every email so there does not seem to be any pattern to which
incoming emails will be duplicated and which ones
I need help with a problem. Our users are seeing some multiple
duplicate emails coming from the same sender. This is not occurring with
every email so there does not seem to be any pattern to which incoming emails
will be duplicated and which ones won’t. They are also reporting
that
I need help with a problem. Our users are seeing some
multiple duplicate emails coming from the same sender. This is not
occurring with every email so there does not seem to be any pattern to which
incoming emails will be duplicated and which ones won’t. They are
also reporting that
34 matches
Mail list logo
