On 11/24/2009 7:10 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On tir 24 nov 2009 19:02:29 CET, Yet Another Ninja wrote
seems simpler than adding 1 domains to freemail's config .-)
that why i like to change it to be paidmail.pm with lists of paid domains
got it now ? :)
spammers can get any free domai
On tir 24 nov 2009 19:02:29 CET, Yet Another Ninja wrote
seems simpler than adding 1 domains to freemail's config .-)
that why i like to change it to be paidmail.pm with lists of paid domains
got it now ? :)
spammers can get any free domain and it can continue as a freemail,
but whe
On 11/24/2009 6:34 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On tir 24 nov 2009 18:30:15 CET, Yet Another Ninja wrote
Freemail.pm plugin does it pretty well without the overhead and cron'd
replication lag...
just one problem with freemail it should list all domain as freemail as
default, unless there is a cl
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 09:22 -0800, R-Elists wrote:
> didnt anyone think that the emailBL project was good enough in adding an
> extra factor of protection to continue development?
I'm using it with a locally sourced set of "bad actors". Unfortunately,
I don't believe I'm allow to share the data.
On tir 24 nov 2009 18:30:15 CET, Yet Another Ninja wrote
Freemail.pm plugin does it pretty well without the overhead and
cron'd replication lag...
just one problem with freemail it should list all domain as freemail
as default, unless there is a clear sign of payment to get it
otherway aro
On tir 24 nov 2009 18:22:25 CET, R-Elists wrote
didnt anyone think that the emailBL project was good enough in adding an
extra factor of protection to continue development?
+1
even without more devel on it, what does miss ?
so far i have just seen one big problem with it, dns servers / mirror
On 11/24/2009 6:22 PM, R-Elists wrote:
didnt anyone think that the emailBL project was good enough in adding an
extra factor of protection to continue development?
- rh
Freemail.pm plugin does it pretty well without the overhead and cron'd
replication lag...
didnt anyone think that the emailBL project was good enough in adding an
extra factor of protection to continue development?
- rh
