. ;-)
Loren
- Original Message -
From: sinnerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 8:49 PM
Subject: Re: help with training bayesian filter
I'm running spamd as:
spamd -d -l -u nobody --siteconfigpath=my site config's path
in some other way?
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/help-with-training-bayesian-filter-tf4643977.html#a13265066
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 04:27:52PM -0700, sinnerman wrote:
Hi All,
I currently have SpamAssaassin setup on my FreeBSD machine and have trained
it with spam and ham messages (greater than the min thresholds of 200/200).
However, I'm not sure it's setup correctly, nor do I see any obvious
it on/off.
--
Gus
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/help-with-training-bayesian-filter-tf4643977.html#a13267625
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
it was a
standard plugin):
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::AutoLearnThreshold
Also, I've found some other help topics on this, and now understand that
autolearn doesn't rely just on the computed score.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/help-with-training-bayesian
sinnerman wrote:
I think I've solved the issues:
* I've stoped using spamc/spamd, and now just use spamassassin (running as
my logged in user, just like sa-learn). I think that has solved the issue of
which bayesian database is being used.
Well, your spamd startup was forcing everything
sinnerman wrote:
I'm running spamd as:
spamd -d -l -u nobody --siteconfigpath=my site config's path
Is there a particular reason why you're using the --siteconfigpath?
The reason I ask is nearly everyone I've seen use this option, mis-uses
it. The only time you should want to use this
