Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The last mass-checks for 3.1.0 gave it a S/O of about 0.980, but I'm
seeing more like 0.900 out of DCC at my site. Could just be the nature
of my site, but about a dozen common subscriber newsletters at my site
consistently hit it.
Which is why it is a
Graham Murray wrote:
Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The last mass-checks for 3.1.0 gave it a S/O of about 0.980, but I'm
seeing more like 0.900 out of DCC at my site. Could just be the nature
of my site, but about a dozen common subscriber newsletters at my site
consistently hit it.
On 12/12/05, Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(plus DIGEST_MULTIPLE) resulted in 6.27 points. And that's with me trimming
down
the DCC_CHECK score to 1.5 from 2.17.
Any particular reason for this?
At 09:25 PM 12/13/2005, Amos wrote:
On 12/12/05, Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(plus DIGEST_MULTIPLE) resulted in 6.27 points. And that's with me
trimming down
the DCC_CHECK score to 1.5 from 2.17.
Any particular reason for this?
I've had too many legitimate newsletters
Pollywog wrote:
On 12/11/2005 05:31 pm, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Craig Zeigler wrote on Sun, 11 Dec 2005 11:11:15 -0500:
The filename is Part 1.1.jpg.
Use MailScanner or another tool to reject/delete mail with that name. If
it is coming from zombies, just disallow zombies at MTA level. Not
Craig Zeigler wrote:
I have been getting hundreds of these messages per day and don't know
how to stop them. The bayes is only come back at 60%.
They are the messages advertising drugs with a random subject (yes, I
know, one of the many) The filename is Part 1.1.jpg. There is no virus
that I
I have been getting hundreds of these messages per day and don't know
how to stop them. The bayes is only come back at 60%.
They are the messages advertising drugs with a random subject (yes, I
know, one of the many) The filename is Part 1.1.jpg. There is no virus
that I can find.
Does
On 12/11/2005 04:11 pm, Craig Zeigler wrote:
I have been getting hundreds of these messages per day and don't know
how to stop them. The bayes is only come back at 60%.
They are the messages advertising drugs with a random subject (yes, I
know, one of the many) The filename is Part 1.1.jpg.
Craig Zeigler wrote on Sun, 11 Dec 2005 11:11:15 -0500:
The filename is Part 1.1.jpg.
Use MailScanner or another tool to reject/delete mail with that name. If
it is coming from zombies, just disallow zombies at MTA level. Not
everything anti-spam should be done with SA.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl,
On 12/11/2005 05:31 pm, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Craig Zeigler wrote on Sun, 11 Dec 2005 11:11:15 -0500:
The filename is Part 1.1.jpg.
Use MailScanner or another tool to reject/delete mail with that name. If
it is coming from zombies, just disallow zombies at MTA level. Not
everything anti-spam
Pollywog wrote on Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:42:38 +:
they do use different names for
their files
well, not according to his posting.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
On 12/11/2005 08:31 pm, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Pollywog wrote on Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:42:38 +:
they do use different names for
their files
well, not according to his posting.
The only thing I could think of to deal with it was to add a Maildrop rule to
send such files to the spam folder
Hi,
while I o not ilke neither html mails nor outlook stationery, they seem to ne a
fact of life.
A rule that drops mails with an image might drop mails using stationary
Wolfgang Hamann
On 12/11/2005 08:31 pm, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Pollywog wrote on Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:42:38 +:
they
13 matches
Mail list logo
