At 14:45 05-09-2008, Greg Troxel wrote:
I don't know that spamassassin pays attention to senderbase; if not this
probablly won't work. I say this, mostly joking, from my experience
with habeas. I have gotten spam on multiple occasions from senders that
are HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI, and complained
RobertH wrote:
Michael,
May we ask and know what you are setting those scores to please?
-rh
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg25017.html
(note, even after complaints above, habeas still claims 'secure
referrals': proof I think that SA should lower these scores A LOT.
>
> Considering that only spammers (er... 'email marketing companies') pay for
> habeas, we have set a POSITIVE score for habeas accredited spam. We track
> any FP right up front, track any rule in a fp (releases from amavisd-new
> managed quarantine), we use sa-learn.pl on shared imap folders,
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Greg Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> After seeing similar spam from "accredited" senders, we disabled any
> score from the habeas rules long ago and have yet to notice any
> increase in FP (we have ~5000 fairly sensitive users who definitely
> let us know w
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Greg Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Does anyone know how you can appeal or query a senderbase rating?
>
> I resisted answering at first, because I'm perhaps a bit too cynical:
>
> The way to appe
"Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does anyone know how you can appeal or query a senderbase rating?
I resisted answering at first, because I'm perhaps a bit too cynical:
The way to appeal is to file a bug with spamassassin saying that
senderbase is bogus and ask t
Hi Michele,
At 03:27 05-09-2008, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight wrote:
Our main issue wasn't with the listing but with the total lack of
appeals procedure or delisting, as several large corporates seem to
trust Senderbase and block based on its score
The "industry's most accurate reputation syste
Joseph
Thanks :)
Our main issue wasn't with the listing but with the total lack of
appeals procedure or delisting, as several large corporates seem to
trust Senderbase and block based on its score
Thanks again
Michele
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting & Colocation, Brand
On 4 Sep 2008, at 15:49, Michael Scheidell wrote:
Does anyone know how you can appeal or query a senderbase rating?
I think senderbase is automatic.. You start spamming, you get on the
list.
You stop spamming, (eventually) you get off the list.
You must be new to the 'net', so you get one
>
> If the spammer had faked a host that really sends mail, then we would
> have had a practical problem to solve. The cheapest solution would
> probably be to rename the host and change its IP, and let the spammer
> keep faking the old name and IP.
>
> Maybe a letter from your lawyer to Ironpo
"Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does anyone know how you can appeal or query a senderbase rating?
No. I tried and failed over a period of many months.
Last year a spammer was inserting a faked Received header into millions
of messages a day, claiming that the spa
> Does anyone know how you can appeal or query a senderbase rating?
I think senderbase is automatic.. You start spamming, you get on the list.
You stop spamming, (eventually) you get off the list.
You must be new to the 'net', so you get one free clue:
As for querying, did you even try to google
Does anyone know how you can appeal or query a senderbase rating?
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
http://www.blacknight.com/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
US: 213-233-1612
UK: 0844 484 9361
Locall: 1850 929 929
Direct Dial: +
13 matches
Mail list logo
