m http://www.netoyen.net/sa/sa-update.sh.txt
m http://www.netoyen.net/sa/channel.conf
They give 403 Forbidden.
jida...@jidanni.org a écrit :
m http://www.netoyen.net/sa/sa-update.sh.txt
m http://www.netoyen.net/sa/channel.conf
They give 403 Forbidden.
should be fixed now. sorry for the annoyance.
???AFAIK Justin is aware of this, and hopefully will have fixed it
soon. :)
On Wed, December 10, 2008 12:28, Justin Mason wrote:
this should be fixed now, I think...
On 15.12.08 03:12, Benny Pedersen wrote:
[...]
[746] dbg: http: GET request,
http://yerp.org/rules/stage/320726402.tar.gz
On Wed, December 10, 2008 12:28, Justin Mason wrote:
???AFAIK Justin is aware of this, and hopefully will have fixed it
soon. :)
this should be fixed now, I think...
[746] dbg: generic: lint check of site pre files succeeded,
continuing with channel updates
[746] dbg: channel: no
[746] dbg: generic: lint check of site pre files succeeded,
continuing with channel updates
[746] dbg: channel: no MIRRORED.BY file available
[746] dbg: http: GET request, http://yerp.org/rules/MIRRORED.BY
[746] dbg: channel: MIRRORED.BY file retrieved
[746] dbg: channel: reading MIRRORED.BY
In article a64af57c-7838-455f-b529-669e95386...@kreme.com, LuKreme
krem...@kreme.com writes
The gpg installed on my FreeBSD does not have a man page (installed by
ports for SA3.2.5, IIRC), just a --help which says the syntax is:
Logically you have security/gnupg installed which means...
%ls -l
My god, let it go, please!
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 17:12 -0700, LuKreme wrote:
On 11-Dec-2008, at 14:29, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
I read a hell of a lot of stuff about all this, and have been running
SA since 2.mumble If you are a plug-n-play sysadmin, then no
problem. If you are already well-versed in the
On 12-Dec-2008, at 07:20, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
If
something doesn't work, please do at least think twice about the
command
that failed, *before* venting your broken syntax to the list.
It wasn't *MY* broken syntax, that's the whole point.
--
The other cats just think he's a tosser.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
LuKreme wrote on Wed, 10 Dec 2008 23:19:25 -0700:
mail# gpg --list-keys /etc/mail/spamassassin/sa-update-keys/pubring.gpg
gpg: error reading key: No public key
I get the same, and without the path to a file I get the keys from the
mail# gpg --list-keys /etc/mail/spamassassin/sa-update-keys/pubring.gpg
gpg: error reading key: No public key
And another doc you didn't read before asking here, LuKreme...
I get the same, and without the path to a file I get the keys from the
global keyring which are non for SA. man gpg
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, LuKreme wrote:
I'm still unclear on how the --gpgkey makes it more secure. If the file
is signed, the signature is checked against the public key that I have
in pubring.gpg. What does the gpgkey do?
It indicates which key to use to check the signature.
--
John Hardin
LuKreme wrote:
On 10-Dec-2008, at 20:36, SM wrote:
it's a hexadecimal number which identifies the key.
And the source of that number is, evidently, a complete mystery.
That's my point. I've seen lots of instructions like this:
# wget http://somesite.tld/somepath/GPG.KEY
# sudo
y
Reply-To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote on Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:48:34 +0100:
Hmm, mine doesn't. :)
My package says gnupg-1.4.5-13.
Instead that option's desc starts with List all
keys from the public keyrings, or just the keys given on the command
line.
Yeah,
At 22:19 10-12-2008, LuKreme wrote:
I ssh to the server and then I sudo su (so I am sure I have discarded
my own login environment, I do not normally do this)
mail# gpg --list-keys /etc/mail/spamassassin/sa-update-keys/pubring.gpg
gpg: error reading key: No public key
gpg --no-default-keyring
Mouss wrote on Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:34:21 +0100:
90_2tld.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net
Thanks, for the tip, I wasn't aware of it. As I understand it helps URIBL
to score on subdomains that it otherwise wouldn't check at all?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive
RobertH wrote on Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:49:28 -0800:
what ones did you keep? if you recall, any particular reason why?
Hm, I checked and it seems I was wrong, partly. I still have them in the
channels.txt for my sa-update. I removed them on some other machines
partly because of memory
On 11-Dec-2008, at 07:39, Bowie Bailey wrote:
LuKreme wrote:
On 10-Dec-2008, at 20:36, SM wrote:
it's a hexadecimal number which identifies the key.
And the source of that number is, evidently, a complete mystery.
That's my point. I've seen lots of instructions like this:
# wget
LuKreme wrote:
On 11-Dec-2008, at 07:39, Bowie Bailey wrote:
It's almost like Just download this key file and you'll be fine.
Don't worry about where it came from, just put it in your keyring.
Not at all, I KNOW where the gpg.key came from, because I downloaded
it. And it came from
On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 13:32 -0700, LuKreme wrote:
It's almost like Just download this key file and you'll be fine. Don't
worry about where it came from, just put it in your keyring.
Not at all, I KNOW where the gpg.key came from, because I downloaded
it. And it came from the same
On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 22:29 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 13:32 -0700, LuKreme wrote:
Not at all, I KNOW where the gpg.key came from, because I downloaded
it. And it came from the same server as the rules are coming.
The KeyID is coming from who knows where.
On 11-Dec-2008, at 14:29, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
...or read the documentation.
I read a hell of a lot of stuff about all this, and have been running
SA since 2.mumble If you are a plug-n-play sysadmin, then no
problem. If you are already well-versed in the vagaries of gpg, then
Duane Hill wrote on Wed, 10 Dec 2008 06:53:39 + (UTC):
Do a search for 'sought' on the SA wiki page
and read the documentation on sa-update before you ask again ;-)
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
LuKreme wrote on Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:50:34 -0700:
Geez there's
a lot of them... and they look like they are very old, with last
updated dates in 2005-2006 and none newer than Aug 2007.
Right. I removed most if not all of the SARE rules on most machines some
months ago with no ill effects.
Kai Schaetzl a écrit :
LuKreme wrote on Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:50:34 -0700:
Geez there's
a lot of them... and they look like they are very old, with last
updated dates in 2005-2006 and none newer than Aug 2007.
Right. I removed most if not all of the SARE rules on most machines some
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 22:54 -0700, LuKreme wrote:
On 9-Dec-2008, at 17:09, John Horne wrote:
Try:
sa-update --gpgkey 6C6191E3 --channel sought.rules.yerp.org
Ok, that gives me no error (where did you find/get the 6C6191E3?). It
sits for about 20-30 seconds and then I get a prompt
Karsten =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Br=E4ckelmann?= writes:
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 20:00 -0600, Chris wrote:
Has anyone seen any updates to the sought rules lately? It seems like it's
been about 4 or 5 days now since I've seen any via sa-update.
I believe this is due to the recent SSL cert update for
Justin Mason wrote:
Karsten =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Br=E4ckelmann?= writes:
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 20:00 -0600, Chris wrote:
Has anyone seen any updates to the sought rules lately? It seems like it's
been about 4 or 5 days now since I've seen any via sa-update.
I believe this is due to the recent SSL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Karsten =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Br=E4ckelmann?= writes:
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 20:00 -0600, Chris wrote:
Has anyone seen any updates to the sought rules lately? It seems
like it's been about 4 or 5 days now since I've seen any via
sa-update.
I believe this is due
John Horne a écrit :
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 22:54 -0700, LuKreme wrote:
On 9-Dec-2008, at 17:09, John Horne wrote:
Try:
sa-update --gpgkey 6C6191E3 --channel sought.rules.yerp.org
Ok, that gives me no error (where did you find/get the 6C6191E3?). It
sits for about 20-30 seconds and then
On 10-Dec-2008, at 01:31, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Duane Hill wrote on Wed, 10 Dec 2008 06:53:39 + (UTC):
Do a search for 'sought' on the SA wiki page
and read the documentation on sa-update before you ask again ;-)
I read the man page, where there is no mention of how to obtain this
LuKreme a écrit :
On 10-Dec-2008, at 01:31, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Duane Hill wrote on Wed, 10 Dec 2008 06:53:39 + (UTC):
Do a search for 'sought' on the SA wiki page
and read the documentation on sa-update before you ask again ;-)
I read the man page, where there is no mention of how to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
LuKreme wrote on Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:51:47 -0700:
I read the man page, where there is no mention of how to obtain this
number. In fact, I read many posts, and many webpages and have still
not found that information. I've seen the
Right. I removed most if not all of the SARE rules on most
machines some months ago with no ill effects.
Kai
what ones did you keep? if you recall, any particular reason why?
- rh
At 13:51 10-12-2008, LuKreme wrote:
I read the man page, where there is no mention of how to obtain this
number. In fact, I read many posts, and many webpages and have still
not found that information. I've seen the IDs in others posts, sure,
but where do they originate?
sa-update uses GPG
On 10-Dec-2008, at 20:36, SM wrote:
At 13:51 10-12-2008, LuKreme wrote:
I read the man page, where there is no mention of how to obtain this
number. In fact, I read many posts, and many webpages and have still
not found that information. I've seen the IDs in others posts, sure,
but where do
At 20:39 10-12-2008, LuKreme wrote:
And the source of that number is, evidently, a complete mystery.
That's my point. I've seen lots of instructions like this:
# wget http://somesite.tld/somepath/GPG.KEY
# sudo sa-update --import GPG.KEY
# sudo sa-update --gpgkey 0E28B3DC --channel
On 10-Dec-2008, at 22:18, SM wrote:
At 20:39 10-12-2008, LuKreme wrote:
And the source of that number is, evidently, a complete mystery.
That's my point. I've seen lots of instructions like this:
# wget http://somesite.tld/somepath/GPG.KEY
# sudo sa-update --import GPG.KEY
# sudo sa-update
LuKreme wrote:
I read the man page, where there is no mention of how to obtain this
number. In fact, I read many posts, and many webpages and have still not
found that information. I've seen the IDs in others posts, sure, but
where do they originate?
Even searching the wiki (which just
I haven't seen an update from sa-update in months. What version is
current?
I have dbg: dns: 5.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org = 709395, parsed as
709395 showing here.
This even after a dns crash and replace.
Nigel
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 09:39:11 +0100, Leveau Stanislas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
the current Sought version : # UPDATE version 320722979
and spamassassin : # UPDATE version 709395
I haven't seen an update from sa-update in months. What version is
current?
I have dbg: dns: 5.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org = 709395, parsed as
709395 showing here.
This even after a dns
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 20:00 -0600, Chris wrote:
Has anyone seen any updates to the sought rules lately? It seems like it's
been about 4 or 5 days now since I've seen any via sa-update.
I believe this is due to the recent SSL cert update for ASF svn. Changed
without a heads up in advance... :(
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 08:51 +, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
I haven't seen an update from sa-update in months. What version is
current?
Nigel, Chris wasn't talking about the stock rule-set, but the
third-party JM_SOUGHT rules. The latter usually are updated multiple
times a day, while the stock
On 9-Dec-2008, at 08:15, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 08:51 +, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
I haven't seen an update from sa-update in months. What version is
current?
Nigel, Chris wasn't talking about the stock rule-set, but the
third-party JM_SOUGHT rules. The latter
LuKreme wrote:
On 9-Dec-2008, at 08:15, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 08:51 +, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
I haven't seen an update from sa-update in months. What version is
current?
Nigel, Chris wasn't talking about the stock rule-set, but the
third-party JM_SOUGHT rules.
On 9-Dec-2008, at 12:48, LuKreme wrote:
I'm thtinking the old rules like 70_sc_top200.cf etc should all be
removed?
Just to be clear, all I have currently active is:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel3278 Dec 9 12:30 dkim.cf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel1749 Dec 7 17:08 init.pre
drwx-- 2
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, Chris wrote:
Has anyone seen any updates to the sought rules lately? It seems like it's
been about 4 or 5 days now since I've seen any via sa-update.
Ditto here.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ ll /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001008/sought_rules_yerp_org
total 320
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root
On 9-Dec-2008, at 12:58, Bill Landry wrote:
Both the official SA rules and 3rd party rules can be updated via
sa-update. For information and instructions, see:
http://daryl.dostech.ca/sa-update/sare/sare-sa-update-howto.txt
Ah yes, I remember a lot of those from the days run rjd. Geez
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 16:50 -0700, LuKreme wrote:
On 9-Dec-2008, at 12:58, Bill Landry wrote:
Both the official SA rules and 3rd party rules can be updated via
sa-update. For information and instructions, see:
http://daryl.dostech.ca/sa-update/sare/sare-sa-update-howto.txt
Ah yes, I
On 9-Dec-2008, at 17:09, John Horne wrote:
Try:
sa-update --gpgkey 6C6191E3 --channel sought.rules.yerp.org
Ok, that gives me no error (where did you find/get the 6C6191E3?). It
sits for about 20-30 seconds and then I get a prompt back. But as far
as I can tell, nothing has changed.
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, LuKreme wrote:
(where did you find/get the 6C6191E3?).
Not too hard:
Do a search for 'sought' on the SA wiki page (which is linked off of
http://spamassassin.apache.org/):
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/
The very first link provided this:
Has anyone seen any updates to the sought rules lately? It seems like it's
been about 4 or 5 days now since I've seen any via sa-update.
--
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
pgpqvBQu4d9qG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
52 matches
Mail list logo
