spam mails bypassing spamassassin?

Hi, I'm running the following mail chain: fetchmail -> postfix -> clamsmtpd -> postfix -> spamassassin 3.1.7 (as local_transport via the spamdeliver python script that came with the spamassassin sources) -> cyrus imapd (where spam gets sorted out based on its score). now, since a few days, i

Re: spam mails bypassing spamassassin?

Am Freitag, 23. Februar 2007 09:56:29 schrieb Mathias Homann: > now, since a few days, i keep getting the same spam mail several times a > day, which has _no_ spamassassin headers at all, as if it has found a way > _around_ my spamassassin. by the way... when i run that offending mail manually th

Re: spam mails bypassing spamassassin?

Am Freitag, 23. Februar 2007 10:06:06 schrieb Mathias Homann: > Am Freitag, 23. Februar 2007 09:56:29 schrieb Mathias Homann: > > now, since a few days, i keep getting the same spam mail several times a > > day, which has _no_ spamassassin headers at all, as if it has found a way > > _around_ my sp

Re: spam mails bypassing spamassassin?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mathias Homann wrote: > Hi, > > > I'm running the following mail chain: > fetchmail -> postfix -> clamsmtpd -> postfix -> spamassassin 3.1.7 (as > local_transport via the spamdeliver python script that came with the > spamassassin sources) -> cyrus

Re: spam mails bypassing spamassassin?

Am Freitag, 23. Februar 2007 10:37:51 schrieb David Goldsmith: > > Check your mail log for error messages like this one: > > spamd[12960]: prefork: server reached --max-children setting, consider > raising it > > We've been running spamd with '-m8' (max children spawned) for quite > sometime and a

Re: spam mails bypassing spamassassin?

Mathias Homann wrote: > Hi, > > > I'm running the following mail chain: > fetchmail -> postfix -> clamsmtpd -> postfix -> spamassassin 3.1.7 (as > local_transport via the spamdeliver python script that came with the > spamassassin sources) -> cyrus imapd (where spam gets sorted out based on its

Re: spam mails bypassing spamassassin?

Am Freitag, 23. Februar 2007 16:12:59 schrieb Matt Kettler: > Mathias Homann wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm running the following mail chain: > > fetchmail -> postfix -> clamsmtpd -> postfix -> spamassassin 3.1.7 (as > > local_transport via the spamdeliver python script that came with the > > spama

Re: spam mails bypassing spamassassin?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Goldsmith wrote: > Check your mail log for error messages like this one: > > spamd[12960]: prefork: server reached --max-children setting, consider > raising it > > We've been running spamd with '-m8' (max children spawned) for quite > sometim

Re: spam mails bypassing spamassassin?

Am Freitag 23 Februar 2007 schrieb Mathias Homann: > Am Freitag, 23. Februar 2007 16:12:59 schrieb Matt Kettler: > > Mathias Homann wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > I'm running the following mail chain: > > > fetchmail -> postfix -> clamsmtpd -> postfix -> spamassassin 3.1.7 (as > > > local_trans

RE: spam mails bypassing spamassassin?

think of it, not sure if this is going to affect you though? Cheers Phil -Original Message- From: Mathias Homann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 2/23/2007 9:56 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: spam mails bypassing spamassassin? Hi, I'm running the following mail

Re: spam mails bypassing spamassassin?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mathias Homann wrote: > Is that size limit configureable? | Usage: spamc [options] [-e command [args]] < message | | Options: | [..] | -s size Specify maximum message size, in bytes. | [default: 250k] - -- Matt

Re: spam mails bypassing spamassassin?

All of that said why would it still eventually give up then and let the mail thru without any attempt to filter? On Feb 23, 2007, at 3:37 AM, David Goldsmith wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mathias Homann wrote: Hi, I'm running the following mail chain: fetchmail -> p