Hi list,
Recently I faced a problem with my network where my e-mail servers
couldn't
contact my MySQL server. Because of that communication error, the incoming
messages passed through without being scanned by spamd.
Reading the sql/README I found the following information:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Henry F. Camacho Jr wrote:
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" is passed to spamd as "hfc"
Since I am running spamassassin site wide, and I have a number of domains hitting this mail server, I really need to have the entire email address represented...Here is what my database looks like:
Matt:
Did you see my post, I got it working just fine. spamass-milter options
-u -e coupled with the following args for SPAMd made this work...
SPAMDOPTIONS="-d -m5 -q -x"
The system now _IGNORES_ the user specified when the milter was called,
and _READS_ the to: address and uses that for a
Henry F. Camacho Jr wrote:
> Ok,
>
>> Just do what Matt said and pass the username to spamc with the -u
>> option. It'll do exactly what you want.
>
> I don't understand what Daryl and Matt are saying by the above?
> Remember this is a system wide installation and not just running for my
> acc
Henry F. Camacho Jr wrote:
> Matt:
>
>> True.. And that username CAN be specified by spamc -u. Spamc passes it
>> to spamd,
>> spamd uses it when calling SQL.
>>
>>
> Quoting from the SPAMc man page:
>
>>-u username
>>This argument has been semi-obsoleted. To have spamd use
DAve wrote:
Henry F. Camacho Jr wrote:
Ok,
Just do what Matt said and pass the username to spamc with the -u
option. It'll do exactly what you want.
I don't understand what Daryl and Matt are saying by the above?
Yes, I believe I have the same basic setup as you. I run spamd on a
c
Henry F. Camacho Jr wrote:
Ok,
Just do what Matt said and pass the username to spamc with the -u
option. It'll do exactly what you want.
I don't understand what Daryl and Matt are saying by the above?
Yes, I believe I have the same basic setup as you. I run spamd on a
central server an
Ok,
Just do what Matt said and pass the username to spamc with the -u
option. It'll do exactly what you want.
I don't understand what Daryl and Matt are saying by the above?
Remember this is a system wide installation and not just running for my
account. I don't know where I would set sp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Randy Smith wrote:
Then I run spamc like so:
spamc -s 512000 -u $RECIPIENT
$RECIPIENT is set by my MTA and is replaced with the user's account
name.
[snip]
What do you do for mail with multiple recipients?
In my case, postfix breaks the message out fo
Henry F. Camacho Jr wrote:
Matt:
True.. And that username CAN be specified by spamc -u. Spamc passes it
to spamd,
spamd uses it when calling SQL.
Quoting from the SPAMc man page:
-u username
This argument has been semi-obsoleted. To have spamd use
per-user-config file
Matt:
True.. And that username CAN be specified by spamc -u. Spamc passes it to spamd,
spamd uses it when calling SQL.
Quoting from the SPAMc man page:
-u username
This argument has been semi-obsoleted. To have spamd use
per-user-config files, run spamc as the user
Henry F. Camacho Jr wrote:
> Matt:
>
> Correct, however it is SPAMD that makes the call to the SQL database if
> I am not mistaken, and there is a convention of passing username with in
> the message.
True.. And that username CAN be specified by spamc -u. Spamc passes it to spamd,
spamd uses it w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Randy Smith wrote:
>> Then I run spamc like so:
>>
>> spamc -s 512000 -u $RECIPIENT
>>
>> $RECIPIENT is set by my MTA and is replaced with the user's account
>> name.
>>
>> [snip]
>
> What do you do for mail with multiple recipients?
>
You either have to accept t
Matt:
Correct, however it is SPAMD that makes the call to the SQL database if
I am not mistaken, and there is a convention of passing username with in
the message. What I want to have happen is each time SPAMd runs a
distributed spam check I would like it to take the To: address, use that
to
Randy Smith wrote:
> Then I run spamc like so:
>
> spamc -s 512000 -u $RECIPIENT
>
> $RECIPIENT is set by my MTA and is replaced with the user's account
> name.
>
> [snip]
What do you do for mail with multiple recipients?
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x
Henry F. Camacho Jr wrote:
Matt:
Thanks, yeah, ideally as each peice of email is being scanned by
SPAMc/SPAMd it would change users and grab the userprefs from the SQL
database.
That's fairly simple. I use that same setup on my systems. I run spamd
with these flags.
spamd -x -d -q
Henry F. Camacho Jr wrote:
> Matt:
>
> Thanks, yeah, ideally as each peice of email is being scanned by
> SPAMc/SPAMd it would change users and grab the userprefs from the SQL
> database.
Ok, well then pass it to spamc..
why are you trying to pass spamd a per-message parameter?
That can't and w
Matt:
Thanks, yeah, ideally as each peice of email is being scanned by
SPAMc/SPAMd it would change users and grab the userprefs from the SQL
database.
HFC
Matt Kettler wrote:
Henry F. Camacho Jr wrote:
I am trying to integrate spamassassin and Scalix. At this point I don't
see anyway
Henry F. Camacho Jr wrote:
> I am trying to integrate spamassassin and Scalix. At this point I don't
> see anyway of passing a username so that spamd will be able to base it's
> query on. It is possible to configure spamd to use the "to:" address as
> the username? It appears from everything tha
I am trying to integrate spamassassin and Scalix. At this point I don't
see anyway of passing a username so that spamd will be able to base it's
query on. It is possible to configure spamd to use the "to:" address as
the username? It appears from everything that I have read, you have to
pass
20 matches
Mail list logo
