On 10.10.2014 3:35, LuKreme wrote:
On Tuesday, October 7, 2014, 10:56:54 PM, LuKreme wrote:
On 07 Oct 2014, at 11:45 , Jari Fredrisson ja...@iki.fi wrote:
I ran sa-update sa-compile.
Should sa-compile be run after sa-update?
Of course it should. I assumed where I wrote .
I was
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 11:50 +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote:
Hi,
/usr/local/bin/sa-update /usr/local/bin/sa-compile
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/sa-spamd restart
the only time spamd would restart is if sa-update AND sa-compile were
successfully completed, correct?
Yes, that's correct.
Martin,
I do something similar on my SA rules development system (I also have SA
installed on this laptop but it is normally not running, which has the
side effect of disabling the standard Fedora sa-update cron job because
this won't run sa-update if it can't find the spamd daemon). My more
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 18:08 +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote:
But you don't do a -lint before restarting SA: if an update was to break
SA (like a big Perl syntax error in a rule, or you are working on a
plugin on your production system, you feel safe because as long as you
don't restart spamd, any
On 08 Oct 2014, at 16:23 , Duane Hill duih...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, October 8, 2014, 3:11:06 PM, LuKreme wrote:
On 08 Oct 2014, at 04:56 , Duane Hill duih...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, October 7, 2014, 10:56:54 PM, LuKreme wrote:
On 07 Oct 2014, at 11:45 , Jari Fredrisson
On 09 Oct 2014, at 18:35 , LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote:
No, that is not what it says.
$ man 1 bash
…
The control operators and || denote AND lists and OR lists,
respectively. An AND list has the form
Sorry for duplicating other’s posts, I replied to the original message out of
On Tuesday, October 7, 2014, 10:56:54 PM, LuKreme wrote:
On 07 Oct 2014, at 11:45 , Jari Fredrisson ja...@iki.fi wrote:
I ran sa-update sa-compile.
Should sa-compile be run after sa-update?
I have a crontab entry:
16 1 * * * /usr/local/bin/sa-update
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/sa-spamd
On Tue, 7 Oct 2014 21:56:54 -0600
LuKreme wrote:
On 07 Oct 2014, at 11:45 , Jari Fredrisson ja...@iki.fi wrote:
I ran sa-update sa-compile.
Should sa-compile be run after sa-update?
I have a crontab entry:
16 1 * * * /usr/local/bin/sa-update
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/sa-spamd
On October 8, 2014 5:56:54 AM LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote:
16 1 * * * /usr/local/bin/sa-update /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sa-spamd
restart
should I add an sa-compile call?
If the plugin for precompiled body rules is enabled yes, check plugins in
pre file
On 08 Oct 2014, at 04:56 , Duane Hill duih...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, October 7, 2014, 10:56:54 PM, LuKreme wrote:
On 07 Oct 2014, at 11:45 , Jari Fredrisson ja...@iki.fi wrote:
I ran sa-update sa-compile.
Should sa-compile be run after sa-update?
I have a crontab entry:
16
On Wednesday, October 8, 2014, 3:11:06 PM, LuKreme wrote:
On 08 Oct 2014, at 04:56 , Duane Hill duih...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, October 7, 2014, 10:56:54 PM, LuKreme wrote:
On 07 Oct 2014, at 11:45 , Jari Fredrisson ja...@iki.fi wrote:
I ran sa-update sa-compile.
Should
On 2014-10-08 15:23, Duane Hill wrote:
No.is a way of chaining commands together. Your cron says run
sa-update and then restart spamd. In other words, when sa-update
finishes running, regardless if there was an update applied or not,
restart spamd.
I thought that ; would chain
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014, Duane Hill wrote:
No. is a way of chaining commands together.
...where the second command is only executed if the first command exited
with a zero status. stops on failure.
try:
true echo was true
false echo was false
If you want it to execute the
On Wednesday, October 8, 2014, 5:31:07 PM, Dave wrote:
On 2014-10-08 15:23, Duane Hill wrote:
No.is a way of chaining commands together. Your cron says run
sa-update and then restart spamd. In other words, when sa-update
finishes running, regardless if there was an update
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 17:23:36 -0500
Duane Hill wrote:
No.is a way of chaining commands together.
is a logical AND
Your cron says run
sa-update and then restart spamd. In other words, when sa-update
finishes running, regardless if there was an update applied or not,
restart
On Oct 8, 2014, at 4:23 PM, Duane Hill duih...@gmail.com wrote:
No.is a way of chaining commands together. Your cron says run
sa-update and then restart spamd. In other words, when sa-update
finishes running, regardless if there was an update applied or not,
restart spamd.
On Wednesday, October 8, 2014, 5:38:20 PM, John wrote:
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014, Duane Hill wrote:
No. is a way of chaining commands together.
...where the second command is only executed if the first command exited
with a zero status. stops on failure.
try:
true echo was true
Looks like I'm late to the party. :-)
--- Amir
thumbed via iPhone
On Oct 8, 2014, at 4:46 PM, Amir Caspi ceph...@3phase.com wrote:
On Oct 8, 2014, at 4:23 PM, Duane Hill duih...@gmail.com wrote:
No.is a way of chaining commands together. Your cron says run
sa-update and then
On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 16:46 -0600, Amir Caspi wrote:
On Oct 8, 2014, at 4:23 PM, Duane Hill duih...@gmail.com wrote:
No.is a way of chaining commands together. Your cron says run
sa-update and then restart spamd. In other words, when sa-update
finishes running,
On Wednesday, October 8, 2014, 6:31:08 PM, Martin confabulated:
On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 16:46 -0600, Amir Caspi wrote:
On Oct 8, 2014, at 4:23 PM, Duane Hill duih...@gmail.com wrote:
No.is a way of chaining commands together. Your cron says run
sa-update and then restart spamd.
Hi,
/usr/local/bin/sa-update /usr/local/bin/sa-compile
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/sa-spamd restart
the only time spamd would restart is if sa-update AND sa-compile were
successfully completed, correct?
Sorry for jumping in the conversation... I have solved that issue by
calling sa-update
I built SA 3.4 using cpan to my old Debian Squeeze-lts.
root@hurricane:~# time service spamassassin start
Starting SpamAssassin Mail Filter Daemon: child process [4868] exited or
timed out without signaling production of a PID file: exit 255 at
/usr/local/bin/spamd line 2960.
real0m1.230s
On 10/07/2014 05:55 PM, Jari Fredrisson wrote:
I built SA 3.4 using cpan to my old Debian Squeeze-lts.
root@hurricane:~# time service spamassassin start
Starting SpamAssassin Mail Filter Daemon: child process [4868] exited or
timed out without signaling production of a PID file: exit 255 at
On 7.10.2014 18:58, Axb wrote:
On 10/07/2014 05:55 PM, Jari Fredrisson wrote:
I built SA 3.4 using cpan to my old Debian Squeeze-lts.
root@hurricane:~# time service spamassassin start
Starting SpamAssassin Mail Filter Daemon: child process [4868] exited or
timed out without signaling
On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 18:55 +0300, Jari Fredrisson wrote:
I built SA 3.4 using cpan to my old Debian Squeeze-lts.
root@hurricane:~# time service spamassassin start
Starting SpamAssassin Mail Filter Daemon: child process [4868] exited or
timed out without signaling production of a PID file:
On 7.10.2014 20:29, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 18:55 +0300, Jari Fredrisson wrote:
I built SA 3.4 using cpan to my old Debian Squeeze-lts.
root@hurricane:~# time service spamassassin start
Starting SpamAssassin Mail Filter Daemon: child process [4868] exited or
timed
Am 07.10.2014 um 19:34 schrieb Jari Fredrisson:
On 7.10.2014 20:29, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 18:55 +0300, Jari Fredrisson wrote:
I built SA 3.4 using cpan to my old Debian Squeeze-lts.
root@hurricane:~# time service spamassassin start
Starting SpamAssassin Mail Filter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7.10.2014 20:38, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 07.10.2014 um 19:34 schrieb Jari Fredrisson:
On 7.10.2014 20:29, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 18:55 +0300, Jari Fredrisson wrote:
I built SA 3.4 using cpan to my old Debian
On 07 Oct 2014, at 11:45 , Jari Fredrisson ja...@iki.fi wrote:
I ran sa-update sa-compile.
Should sa-compile be run after sa-update?
I have a crontab entry:
16 1 * * * /usr/local/bin/sa-update /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sa-spamd restart
should I add an sa-compile call?
--
'It's still a lie.
-Original Message-
From: xoops?? [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 1:00 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: spamd does not start
Hi,
I have newly installed spamassassin-3.0.1 into linux box
2.4.18-22 running qmail
Hi,
(B
(BI have newly installed spamassassin-3.0.1 into linux box 2.4.18-22 running
(Bqmail with qmail-queue patch.
(BHaving a trouble to start spamd with SPAMDOPTIONS="-x -u spamd -H /home/spamd
(B-d":
(B
(B "Starting spamd: Bareword "SO_REUSEPORT" not allowed while "strict subs" in
xoops$B
From: "alan premselaar" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(BTo: "xoops$B<B83<<4IM}?M(B" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(BCc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
(BSent: 2004 December, 02, Thursday 23:27
(BSubject: Re: spamd does not start
(B
(B
(B xoops$B<B83<<4IM}?M(B wrote:
(B
My IO::Socket version is 1.26 which is up to date, CPAN says.
Alan, is my font readable in your screen ?
Thanks.
Hi,
I have newly installed spamassassin-3.0.1 into linux box 2.4.18-22 running
qmail with qmail-queue patch.
Having a trouble to start spamd with SPAMDOPTIONS=-x -u spamd
jdow wrote:
(B From: "alan premselaar" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B To: "xoops$B<B83<<4IM}?M(B" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
(B Sent: 2004 December, 02, Thursday 23:27
(B Subject: Re: spamd does not start
(B
(B
(B
(Bxoops$B<B83<&l
(actually was a problem with Time::HiRes and Net::DNS)
Dan
-Original Message-
From: xoops?? [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 1:00 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: spamd does not start
Hi,
I have newly installed spamassassin
36 matches
Mail list logo