training messages to become useful:
[8295] dbg: bayes: not available for scanning, only 185 ham(s) in bayes DB 200
Yes, it is another problem we are trying to fix.
Otherwise it all looks fine. Your sample message really does not hit
much, so an occasional tests=[none] does not necessarily
,__TVD_MIME_ATT_TP
Return-Path: srs0=uulz=s2=listserv.rediris.es=owner-lavad...@puc.rediris.es
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on xenon11.um.es
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled
version=3.2.5
X-Original-To: ama...@um.es
Delivered
[8295] dbg: razor2: razor2 is not available
and the bayes database still lacks a few training messages to become useful:
[8295] dbg: bayes: not available for scanning, only 185 ham(s) in bayes DB 200
Otherwise it all looks fine. Your sample message really does not hit
much, so an occasional tests
El 25/11/10 12:48, Tom Kinghorn escribió:
On 2010/11/25 01:10 PM, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
Hello,
We are running spamassassin (with postfix and amavisd-new) for a long
time.
Since a time, I'm observing that I have a lot of messages with:
have you tried a debug?
spamassassin -t -D
Angel,
Since a time, I'm observing that I have a lot of messages with:
have you tried a debug?
spamassassin -t -D spam-message
Now I've done. This is an example for a message:
Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
Hello,
We are running spamassassin (with postfix and amavisd-new) for a long
time.
Since a time, I'm observing that I have a lot of messages with:
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-4 required=5 tests=[none
On 2010/11/25 01:10 PM, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
Hello,
We are running spamassassin (with postfix and amavisd-new) for a
long time.
Since a time, I'm observing that I have a lot of messages with:
have you tried a debug?
spamassassin -t -D spam-message
will produce a report similar
Yet their markup shows:
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
Old-X-Spam-Score: 0
Old-X-Spam-Level:
Old-X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-10 required=6 tests=[none]
Their explaination for this is:
It's not that they had no tests run, it's that they had all the tests run
and the score
-Spam-Spammy: Tokens 33
X-Spam-Pyzor: Reported 677 times.
X-Spam-DCC: cpollock 104; Body=many Fuz1=many Fuz2=many
Yet their markup shows:
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
Old-X-Spam-Score: 0
Old-X-Spam-Level:
Old-X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-10 required=6 tests=[none
On Saturday 14 July 2007 10:48 am, SM wrote:
Yet their markup shows:
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
Old-X-Spam-Score: 0
Old-X-Spam-Level:
Old-X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-10 required=6
tests=[none]
Their explaination for this is:
It's not that they had
At 09:36 AM 7/14/2007, Chris wrote:
I realize they're not using the same tests or plug-ins as I am, i=
t=20
just doesn't make sense to me that an ISP could run all possible tests and=
=20
have none of them hit.
I just removed the max limit to scan messages from Amasd-new because
I came in
news [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/25/2006 08:36:11 AM:
Thanks Chris I'll do that.. can someone please remind me where I set the
max_child limit?? Like I said I could not find it last night I want to
see
what it is set to now and adjust accordingly.
It's the -m parameter you specify
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Debbie D
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 10:50 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: score=0.0 tests=none -- how can that be???
I'm just not getting it.. I have a whole list of custom rules, I use
do not adjust tings here, I do.. I use lint when
I
add scores and rules..
So tell me.. how in the past week or so I have 11 mails in *my* box that
show:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=4.5 tests=none
Usually that means a timeout, or your milter was configured to skip SA
scores to mark stuff higher.. I have
reasonable
limits set.. the users do not adjust tings here, I do.. I use lint
when
I
add scores and rules..
So tell me.. how in the past week or so I have 11 mails in *my* box
that
show:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=4.5 tests=none
Usually
mails in *my* box that
show:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=4.5 tests=none
Of these 3 are very valid mails, one from a user on my system but sent thru
the companies DSL connection and should have caught something.. AWL or
something. The second valid mail is a payment from paypal.. again
week or so I have 11 mails in *my* box that
show:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=4.5 tests=none
Usually that means a timeout, or your milter was configured to skip SA
for the message.
How do you call SA? mimedefang? spamc call in procmail.rc?
use lint when
I
add scores and rules..
So tell me.. how in the past week or so I have 11 mails in *my* box that
show:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=4.5 tests=none
Usually that means a timeout, or your milter was configured to skip SA
for the message.
How do you call SA
Exim 4.52 with SA and ClamAV I use spamc
Oh, one other condition that can cause a tests=none.. if the size of
the message is greater than the -s parameter to spamc.. (default 250k )
Well that theory definitely does not hold water in this case :) the paypal
one is 4k and most of the others
$LOGNAME
I haven't seen a 'tests=none' since doing those two things. I'm not sure
which one helped. I suspect it's a combination of both. The real culprit,
however, is most likely a SLOW SERVER. Yes, mine is very (relatively)
slow. I have the same setup at work as at home and never see 'tests=none
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 05:45:04PM +0200, Jim Knuth wrote:
The headers shown the follow
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-.9 required=4 tests=[none]
X-Spam-Score: 0
Or should I arrange the question of the amavis list?
It depends, is that every message (then yes, ask the amavis
21 matches
Mail list logo
