John D. Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, aag_uk wrote:
(1) Check your MTA options. Some allow you to configure rejection of a
message after X number of invalid recipients are given.
(2) Consider a rule that adds a point if more than X names appear in
the TO: and/or CC: headers.
a) is probably going to be quite resource-intensive;
I don´t really know, according to
http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=12207486framed=y
sm-7 say that it shouldn´t be
b) requires LDAP, NIS, etc., so that SpamAssassin can have a clue
about your accounts;
c) requires competent
Aag_uk wrote on Sat, 18 Aug 2007 03:33:49 -0700 (PDT):
it´s quite unlikely that somebody tags any of
my users
as I said it may work for you, it will not work for the majority of SA
users. The whole effort and the FPs would not be worth it. If you don't
believe that, start coding.
Kai
--
Alberto, your reasoning is correct, based on my experience of actually
implementing and using such a system, albeit in a small scale environment.
As sm points out, it is particularly useful as a pass rule for exact
matches to your users' actual email client real names.
I've implemented this as
Kai Schätzl wrote:
You don't understand at all. What gets put in the comment is up to the
sender.
They can put *everything* there and it's legit. You do not control it at all
and you do not send them a reply please change my name in your addressbook
to
xyz. It can be the name, a part
Hi,
I´m pretty new to SpamAssassin and maybe what I am saying is nonsense or
somebody else has suggested this, or the test already exists but I don´t
know how to configure it, anyway here is my question.
I´ve noticed that some spam messages not marked as spam by spamassassin (the
score is
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, aag_uk wrote:
I´ve noticed that some spam messages not marked as spam by spamassassin (the
score is lower than the limit I´ve set: 5.0. Those emails usually have some
hints that suggest they are probably spam: score about 4.6). These message
are addressed to many people in
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, aag_uk wrote:
These message are addressed to many people in my domain but the
names before the email address are random. To explain it more
clearly, for example, the recipient in the TO field is something
like this: John [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Very ofter the CC field
At 13:58 17-08-2007, Chris St. Pierre wrote:
That's an interesting idea, but it
a) is probably going to be quite resource-intensive;
Not really.
c) requires competent fuzzy matching so that, when a user sends mail
to Chris St. Pierre [EMAIL PROTECTED], it doesn't flag it
as spam because my
Hi,=20
I=C2=B4m pretty new to SpamAssassin and maybe what I am saying is nonsense =
or
somebody else has suggested this, or the test already exists but I don=C2=
=B4t
know how to configure it, anyway here is my question.
I=C2=B4ve noticed that some spam messages not marked as spam by
10 matches
Mail list logo
