Hi Andreas,
At 11:45 20-11-2012, Andreas Schulze wrote:
I have a similiar issue with a web.de (german webmail) user. He uses
his iPhone
to submit mail via web.de submission service. (TLS + Authentication)
The message triggers RCVD_IN_PBL and others. Any hint to make those
message pass sa?
82
This is quite different. The IP delivering the email to your server is
what's hitting RCVD_IN_PBL. Providing that part of the spamassassin -t
output so I didn't need to do it myself would've been helpful.
pts rule name description
-- ---
Am So, 18.11.2012, 18:48 schrieb dar...@chaosreigns.com:
>> are you sure? I will report it to my ISP
>
> No, I'm not sure, which is why I said "I believe" and "But I haven't
> actually looked into those details lately. We need better documentation
> of this". But I am very confident somethin
On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 17:07:39 -0500
dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> On 11/18, RW wrote:
> > Whilst that wont hurt, it's not the real cause of the problem here
> > which rests entirely with UnifiedeMail.net.
> >
> > Whilst it would have prevented this FP, authentication is intended
> > to solve a d
On 11/18, RW wrote:
> Whilst that wont hurt, it's not the real cause of the problem here which
> rests entirely with UnifiedeMail.net.
>
> Whilst it would have prevented this FP, authentication is intended to
> solve a different problem. It shouldn't be necessary to have a
> workaround for the int
On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 21:09:11 -0800 (PST)
umeca74 wrote:
> > Is 1and1.co.uk in the trusted hosts?
ContentAnalysis[at]UnifiedeMail.net is an address you can send an email
to and get back a SpamAssassin report on that email.
> >Received: from hppro (ppp-94-68-74-194.home.otenet.gr
> >[94.68.74.19
On 11/17, umeca74 wrote:
> >Received: from hppro (ppp-94-68-74-194.home.otenet.gr [94.68.74.194])
> > by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap1) with ESMTP (Nemesis)
> >
> > I believe if that said "ESMTPA" instead of "ESMTP",
> > you would not have that problem
>
> are you sure? I will report i
> Have you submitted your sample to Unifiedemail via the webform,
> or via e-mail ?
email (MS Outlook)
> Is 1and1.co.uk in the trusted hosts?
not sure what you mean. The server IP address is _not_ blacklisted (PBL
etc). I am not running the server, I am a plain user connecting through the
ISP
>
>
> - Original Message - From: "umeca74"
> To:
> Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2012 5:00 PM
> Subject: Re: wrong RCVD_IN_PBL?
>
>
> >>Your IP (ppp-94-68-74-194.home.otenet.gr is: 94.68.74.194) looks like
> >>a dynamic home use
received it from
kundenserver.
Have you submitted your sample to Unifiedemail via the webform, or via
e-mail ?
Frédéric
- Original Message -
From: "umeca74"
To:
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2012 5:00 PM
Subject: Re: wrong RCVD_IN_PBL?
Your IP (ppp-94-68-74-194.home.ot
On 11/17, Frederic De Mees wrote:
> From: "umeca74"
> >
> >3.3 RCVD_IN_PBL
> >RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
> >[94.68.74.194 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
> >
>
> Your IP (ppp-94-68-74-194.home.otenet.gr is: 94.68.74.194) looks
> like a dynamic home user subscriber line (adsl, cable, di
Is 1and1.co.uk in the trusted hosts?
On Sat, 17 Nov 2012, umeca74 wrote:
Your IP (ppp-94-68-74-194.home.otenet.gr is: 94.68.74.194) looks like
a dynamic home user subscriber line (adsl, cable, dialup).
that's correct
PBL contains ranges of IP addresses that should never send e-mail
directly
> Your IP (ppp-94-68-74-194.home.otenet.gr is: 94.68.74.194) looks like
> a dynamic home user subscriber line (adsl, cable, dialup).
that's correct
> PBL contains ranges of IP addresses that should never send e-mail
> directly to other domains.
that's what I'm saying, I am NOT sending emails
From: "umeca74"
3.3 RCVD_IN_PBL
RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
[94.68.74.194 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
Your IP (ppp-94-68-74-194.home.otenet.gr is: 94.68.74.194) looks like a
dynamic home user subscriber line (adsl, cable, dialup).
PBL contains ranges of IP addresses that sho
here are the full headers
Received: from mx.mg2.unifiedemail.net ([10.251.10.236]) by
corpserv1.corp.unifiedemail.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675);
Fri, 16 Nov 2012 22:20:32 -0500
Received: from ([127.0.0.1]) with MailEnable ESMTP; Fri, 16 Nov 2012
22:20:28 -0500
Received: from
On 11/16, umeca74 wrote:
> thanks for your reply. By "MTA" you mean my email program, Microsoft Outlook?
> I didn't change any of its settings, is there anything I could try?
No, your mail server software. If your mail client (outlook) could add it,
then any client could forge that information.
On 11/16, umeca74 wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am doing some tests sending my emails to contentanaly...@unifiedemail.net
> to assess their "spamminess"
>
> when I send an email through e.g. hotmail, then it is low scored by
> spamassassin
>
> if I use MS Outlook to go through my SMTP server I immediatel
Hello
I am doing some tests sending my emails to contentanaly...@unifiedemail.net
to assess their "spamminess"
when I send an email through e.g. hotmail, then it is low scored by
spamassassin
if I use MS Outlook to go through my SMTP server I immediately see a hefty
spam score on account of a bl
18 matches
Mail list logo
