At 12:39 PM Friday, 2/29/2008, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote -=>
Hi!
The traceroute output doesn't mean that something is broken.
The web site in the subject line has denial of service
protection. It may be reachable by some and unreachable to others.
How then would you explain why it worked jus
Hi!
The traceroute output doesn't mean that something is broken.
The web site in the subject line has denial of service protection. It may
be reachable by some and unreachable to others.
How then would you explain why it worked just fine up until some point this
week? Has the denial of se
At 11:20 AM Friday, 2/29/2008, SM wrote -=>
At 05:09 29-02-2008, Ed Kasky wrote:
Something's broken somewhere. From sunny Los Angeles where it was
80 degrees yesterday:
The traceroute output doesn't mean that something is broken.
The web site in the subject line has denial of service
protec
At 05:09 29-02-2008, Ed Kasky wrote:
Something's broken somewhere. From sunny Los Angeles where it was
80 degrees yesterday:
The traceroute output doesn't mean that something is broken.
The web site in the subject line has denial of service
protection. It may be reachable by some and unreac
Well, same here, from Argentina
2008/2/29, DAve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> User for SpamAssassin Mail List wrote:
> > I have the same problem here:
> >
> > traceroute to www.rulesemporium.com (72.52.4.74), 30 hops max, 38 byte
> > packets
> > 1 roxanne.pc
User for SpamAssassin Mail List wrote:
I have the same problem here:
traceroute to www.rulesemporium.com (72.52.4.74), 30 hops max, 38 byte
packets
1 roxanne.pcez.com (209.102.124.1) 0.179 ms 0.146 ms 0.143 ms
2 52.ATM5-0.GW9.POR3.ALTER.NET (157.130.180.65) 3.016 ms 3.190 ms 2.917 ms
I have the same problem here:
traceroute to www.rulesemporium.com (72.52.4.74), 30 hops max, 38 byte
packets
1 roxanne.pcez.com (209.102.124.1) 0.179 ms 0.146 ms 0.143 ms
2 52.ATM5-0.GW9.POR3.ALTER.NET (157.130.180.65) 3.016 ms 3.190 ms 2.917 ms
3 0.so-4-3-0.XT2.POR3.ALTER.NET
Ed Kasky wrote:
At 12:08 AM Friday, 2/29/2008, blaine wrote -=>
I was not able to access http://www.rulesemporium.com? is this working
are moved some where?
Works fine from here. Site is reachable and resolves to 72.52.4.74
which pings fine as well.
Something's broken somewher
At 12:08 AM Friday, 2/29/2008, blaine wrote -=>
I was not able to access http://www.rulesemporium.com? is this working
are moved some where?
Works fine from here. Site is reachable and resolves to 72.52.4.74
which pings fine as well.
Something's broken somewhere. From sunny Los
i All,
> >>
> >> First Im realy dont know this is the right forum to ask my doubts?
> >>
> >> I was not able to access http://www.rulesemporium.com? is this working
> >> are moved some where?
> >>
> >> www.rulesemporium.com resolve
On 2/29/2008 9:01 AM, ram wrote:
On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 11:30 +0530, Johnson Jeba Asir wrote:
Hi All,
First Im realy dont know this is the right forum to ask my doubts?
I was not able to access http://www.rulesemporium.com? is this working
are moved some where?
www.rulesemporium.com resolved
I was not able to access http://www.rulesemporium.com? is this working
are moved some where?
Works fine from here. Site is reachable and resolves to 72.52.4.74
which pings fine as well.
--Blaine
On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 11:30 +0530, Johnson Jeba Asir wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> First Im realy dont know this is the right forum to ask my doubts?
>
> I was not able to access http://www.rulesemporium.com? is this working
> are moved some where?
>
> www.rulesemporium.com res
Hi All,
First Im realy dont know this is the right forum to ask my doubts?
I was not able to access http://www.rulesemporium.com? is this working
are moved some where?
www.rulesemporium.com resolved to 72.52.4.74, but ping failed for me,
Thanks in advance
Regards,
a.Johnson
wolfgang wrote:
Hi,
http connections to www.rulesemporium.com are timing out here. Maybe someone
in charge is reading this and can fix it ...
regards,
wolfgang
There seems to be an issue with the filesystem on that box. Email sent
to the appropriate people, but it looks like a
At 12:58 PM Friday, 7/22/2005, wolfgang wrote -=>
Hi,
http connections to www.rulesemporium.com are timing out here. Maybe someone
in charge is reading this and can fix it ...
This seems to happen once in a a while...
I wonder if it's ISP related?
Ed Kasky
~
Randomly Generat
Hi,
http connections to www.rulesemporium.com are timing out here. Maybe someone
in charge is reading this and can fix it ...
regards,
wolfgang
Regarding Fred's rule sets at
http://www.rulesemporium.com/other-rules.htm. Do these duplicate any of
the other SARE rules? Are they advised for Spam Assassin 3.0x? Are
there any known issues with false positives for Asian or other
languages? Have they been mass checked?
Thanks for any
e [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 9:11 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: www.rulesemporium.com
>
>
>Not too sure why you've cc:ed me in on this mail, as there's
>no quoted text that I wrote (and I'm on the list, so no
> -Original Message-
> From: Rick Macdougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 8:10 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: www.rulesemporium.com
>
>
>
> Ricardo Campos Passanezi wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 07,
Not too sure why you've cc:ed me in on this mail, as there's no quoted text
that I wrote (and I'm on the list, so now have two copies... thanks).
It looks like the root name servers are once again giving out the NS records
for the domain, but the specified auth servers for it appear to know noth
Ricardo Campos Passanezi wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 11:09:50AM -, Martyn Drake wrote:
Indeed it is - perhaps somebody accidently nuked the zone from the
nameserver by accident :)
Take a look at:
http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=rulesemporium.com
It has failed for many pa
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 11:09:50AM -, Martyn Drake wrote:
>
> Indeed it is - perhaps somebody accidently nuked the zone from the
> nameserver by accident :)
Take a look at:
http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=rulesemporium.com
It has failed for many parameters...
--
Ricardo
Owen McShane wrote on 07 December 2004 11:04:
> That Status: Locked doesn't look too good.
I always thought that was the register lock so that nobody can make changes
to the domain name (i.e. change nameservers) until the domain has been
unlocked. It's an anti-abuse system. Normally you would h
Fascinating - I must have hit a hitch in the gitalong somewhere.
That is the first time "whois" has seriously failed me like that.
{O.O}
- Original Message -
From: "Martyn Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> jdow wrote on 07 December 2004 10:59:
>
> > Fascinating - "whois" doesn't even report
e: 16-oct-2005
$ nslookup www.rulesemporium.com DNS1.NAME-SERVICES.COM
Server: DNS1.NAME-SERVICES.COM
Address:63.251.163.102#53
Name: www.rulesemporium.com
Address: 69.56.160.30
-Frank.
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004, jdow wrote:
Fascinating - "whois" doesn't even report a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Fascinating - "whois" doesn't even report a vistage of the name. {^_^}
Does for me:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] owen]$ jwhois rulesemporium.com
[Querying whois.internic.net]
[Redirected to whois.enom.com]
[Querying whois.enom.com]
[whois.enom.com]
Registration Service Provided
jdow wrote on 07 December 2004 10:59:
> Fascinating - "whois" doesn't even report a vistage of the name.
> {^_^}
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [~]# whois rulesemporium.com
[Querying whois.internic.net]
[Redirected to whois.enom.com]
[Querying whois.enom.com]
[whois.enom.com]
Registration Service Provided B
Martin Hepworth wrote on 07 December 2004 10:49:
> Did you forget to re-register the domain
It's registered until October 2005 (according to the WHOIS lookup), so I
would doubt that's the issue . The nameservers are not letting up
their secrets - it's returning a big fat nowt when querying t
Fascinating - "whois" doesn't even report a vistage of the name.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Hepworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Chris
>
> rulesemporium seems to be down (not resolving actually).
>
> Did you forget to re-register the domain
>
> --
> Martin Hepworth
> Snr
Chris
rulesemporium seems to be down (not resolving actually).
Did you forget to re-register the domain
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
**
This email and any files transmit
31 matches
Mail list logo
