Re: Problem with "svn add" command

2010-03-15 Thread Itamar O
Both the escaping of the '-' and adding '--' before the filename did the trick :-) Thanks! BTW, This was on Windows. On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 2:05 AM, Ryan Schmidt < subversion-20...@ryandesign.com> wrote: > > On Mar 15, 2010, at 16:12, Aaron Friesen wrote: > > > From: Itamar O [mailto:itamar...@

Re: Expected format problem

2010-03-15 Thread Jeremy Conlin
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Mar 15, 2010, at 22:09, Jeremy Conlin wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >>> No, it means the version of Subversion that is directly reading the >>> repository is older than the version of Subversion that create

Re: Expected format problem

2010-03-15 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 15, 2010, at 22:09, Jeremy Conlin wrote: > On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> No, it means the version of Subversion that is directly reading the >> repository is older than the version of Subversion that created the >> repository. >> >> "Directly reading" means proba

Re: Expected format problem

2010-03-15 Thread Jeremy Conlin
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Mar 15, 2010, at 16:12, Jeremy Conlin wrote: > >> I'll bet this is an oft asked question on this list.  I'm getting the error: >> >> svn: Expected FS format '2'; found format '4' >> >> If I understand correctly, this means that my local ver

Re: Symbolic links

2010-03-15 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 15, 2010, at 06:59, David Weintraub wrote: > Symbolic links are not supported directly by Subversion. Of course they are, on operating systems other than Windows.

Re: Expected format problem

2010-03-15 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 15, 2010, at 16:12, Jeremy Conlin wrote: > I'll bet this is an oft asked question on this list. I'm getting the error: > > svn: Expected FS format '2'; found format '4' > > If I understand correctly, this means that my local version of svn > differs from the remote version of svn. Is th

Re: Problem with "svn add" command

2010-03-15 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 15, 2010, at 16:12, Aaron Friesen wrote: > From: Itamar O [mailto:itamar...@gmail.com] >> I have an unversioned file named "- example.txt" (don't ask why..), >> and when I 'svn add "- example.txt"' I get: >> svn: invalid option character: >> Type 'svn help' for usage. > > Try: > > s

Re: Problem with "svn add" command

2010-03-15 Thread David Weintraub
A slash in front of a file name can be confused with a parameter. The trick is to prefix files with a ./: $ svn add ./-example.txt That way, Subversion doesn't think the -example.txt are a series of parameters to pass to the svn add command. If there's a space after the dash and before the first

RE: Problem with "svn add" command

2010-03-15 Thread Aaron Friesen
> From: Itamar O [mailto:itamar...@gmail.com] > I might be doing something wrong here, > but I have an unversioned file named "- example.txt" (don't ask why..), > and when I 'svn add "- example.txt"' I get: >   svn: invalid option character: >   Type 'svn help' for usage. Try: svn add -- "- ex

Expected format problem

2010-03-15 Thread Jeremy Conlin
I'll bet this is an oft asked question on this list. I'm getting the error: svn: Expected FS format '2'; found format '4' If I understand correctly, this means that my local version of svn differs from the remote version of svn. Is this right? I installed 1.6.9 today on both my local version a

Problem with "svn add" command

2010-03-15 Thread Itamar O
I might be doing something wrong here, but I have an unversioned file named "- example.txt" (don't ask why..), and when I 'svn add "- example.txt"' I get: svn: invalid option character: Type 'svn help' for usage. Seems that the add command thinks the initial "-" is an option prefix... This als

Re: Log excluding svn:mergeinfo changes

2010-03-15 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:48:13AM -0500, Thomas S. Trias wrote: > Is there a good way to get the log for a path excluding changes that > only affected svn:mergeinfo? We have a project with several one-off > copies of files, where changes to the copyfrom-path get merged in > periodically. We then

Re: Best way to capture implicit affected paths for a revision

2010-03-15 Thread Thomas S. Trias
Stefan, I had thought the same about the diff implementation; I guess it pays to search the issue tracker. I will keep on chugging along until such time as diff is fixed. Thanks, Thomas S. Trias Senior Developer Artizan Internet Services http://www.artizan.com/

Re: Best way to capture implicit affected paths for a revision

2010-03-15 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:33:23AM -0500, Thomas S. Trias wrote: > Some of our utilities require a list of changed paths for a > revision, including the sub-paths included in a directory delete / > replace / copy. For the replace, the ideal situation is to capture > a set of deletes, replaces, and

Log excluding svn:mergeinfo changes

2010-03-15 Thread Thomas S. Trias
Is there a good way to get the log for a path excluding changes that only affected svn:mergeinfo? We have a project with several one-off copies of files, where changes to the copyfrom-path get merged in periodically. We then have a feature branch that gets merges from trunk. When we merge to

Best way to capture implicit affected paths for a revision

2010-03-15 Thread Thomas S. Trias
Some of our utilities require a list of changed paths for a revision, including the sub-paths included in a directory delete / replace / copy. For the replace, the ideal situation is to capture a set of deletes, replaces, and adds for the descendants. We started out using a combination of svn

Re: svn diff ignores externals

2010-03-15 Thread Max
Hi Stefan, thank you very much for your explanations. Actually, I am not complaining about what default behavior should be - either the recursive or not recursive one would be to me perfectly valid. Unfortunately, svn diff is not able to recursively follow externals, as it does not accept the o

Re: Symbolic links

2010-03-15 Thread David Weintraub
Symbolic links are not supported directly by Subversion. The NTFS file system does allow for symbolic links, but until Windows Vista, there was no command that could produce symbolic links. The "mklink" command works in Windows 7 and Windows Vista. You need System admin rights in order to use this

"Could not read chunk size" when trying to checkout or update on Windows (after 2gb downloaded)

2010-03-15 Thread Mark Taylor
Hi, We have a fairly large SVN repository, and it has reached the point where it surpasses 2gb worth of files. When checking out the files on Linux, everything works fine. But on Windows Vista when checking out (or updating) with the command-line, or tortoiseSVN, smartSVN etc, after 2.15GB ha

Server Certificate in subversion

2010-03-15 Thread Christian Fischer
Hi there! I am acting on a small problem with an older version of Subversion. svn, version 1.4.6 (r28521) The --trust-server-certificate Option is not supported. Though...i want to call the svn co and svn up commands from within a php-file and due to this i have no interactive shell to accept

Re: Symbolic links

2010-03-15 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 15, 2010, at 02:04, Han,Xing wrote: > Symbolic link is supported in windows now? Not as far as I know.

Symbolic links

2010-03-15 Thread Han,Xing
hi, Symbolic link is supported in windows now? if can, please tell how to do that. thank you very much! yours Starhan