Re: SVN Keywords...

- Original Message > From: David Weintraub > I'm not sure what you are planning on doing, but usually the RCS > Keywords are not a good idea. They usually cause more problems than > they solve. What usually works better (especially in C and C++) is to > define macros at compile time t

Re: SVN Keywords...

I'm not sure what you are planning on doing, but usually the RCS Keywords are not a good idea. They usually cause more problems than they solve. What usually works better (especially in C and C++) is to define macros at compile time that are embedded in your program as strings. For example, you cou

Re: Network Drive Support ?

On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Phil Pinkerton wrote: > Question from a client: > > Does Subversion support checking out to a "network drive" many miles away ? Yes, but the performance can vary tremendously depending on the network topoloogy and the network drive technology. A CIFS or typical wi

SVN Keywords...

I have a series of projects that operate as service daemons; all the projects have a simple main.cpp that loads another class that does the actual work. So I never have to touch main.cpp except when I go to make a release, and then only to update a couple things: version numbers and dates. I'd

Re: Unable to use filter command properly.

Rajnish Kumar Singh wrote on Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 19:58:26 +0530: > > svnadmin create target > > svnsync init file://.../target file://.../OR1234/Test > > svnsync sync file://.../target > Please tell me that in the given command i.e : svnsync init file://.../target > file://.../OR1234

Re: Hi! I have problems

On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 5:40 AM, John Doe wrote: > If you google for: > >  svn "Secure connection truncated" > > the first and second answers propose one solution.  maybe try it and see if > your > problems disappear? I just did that google, and the first post (http://gallery.menalto.com/node/53

Re: mergeinfo on all root files and folders

On Tuesday 26 October 2010, James French wrote: > We always do merges from the root of the repository. Sounds weird, how do you do that? This means that either the source and target URL are the same, which makes this a no-op (unless perhaps when reverse-merging etc), or the source URL is a child

RE: Unable to use filter command properly.

-Original Message- From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name] Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 7:32 PM To: Rajnish Kumar Singh Cc: Feldhacker, Chris; users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: Unable to use filter command properly. Rajnish Kumar Singh wrote on Tue, Oct 26, 2010 a

RE: Unable to use filter command properly.

-Original Message- From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name] Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 6:26 PM To: Rajnish Kumar Singh Cc: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: Unable to use filter command properly. Rajnish Kumar Singh wrote on Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 18:07:04 +0530: >

Re: Unable to use filter command properly.

Rajnish Kumar Singh wrote on Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 18:44:59 +0530: > Yes I have done that but getting an error message: > . > . > . > . > Revision 3745 committed as 3745. > Revision 3746 committed as 3746. > Revision 3747 committed as 3747. > Revision 3748 committed as 3748. > svndumpfilter: Invalid

RE: Unable to use filter command properly.

Yes I have done that but getting an error message: . . . . Revision 3745 committed as 3745. Revision 3746 committed as 3746. Revision 3747 committed as 3747. Revision 3748 committed as 3748. svndumpfilter: Invalid copy source path '/V1.1NewSVNDirectory' -Original Message- From: Feldhacker,

RE: Network Drive Support ?

> From: Phil Pinkerton [mailto:pcpinker...@gmail.com] > > Question from a client: > > Does Subversion support checking out to a "network drive" > many miles away ? > > They are asking due to extremely slow checkouts across a WAN > to a NAS drive. I need a technical answer with regards to the

Re: RES: Subversion 1.6.13 Released

Greetings, Cooke, Mark! >> > I am using SSPI alongside David's 1.6.13 builds (thanks again, > David!) >> > on apache on a windoze server box with no problems. >> >> > From recent list traffic, issues with large commits failing seem to > be >> > related to timeout issues, search through the recent

Re: Unable to use filter command properly.

Rajnish Kumar Singh wrote on Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 18:07:04 +0530: > Hi Danial, > I apologies for the last mail > No problem. > These are the output of 'svnadmin load' command. > > And these are the output of svndumpfilter It seems that the dumpfile is indeed empty. I'd guess the path pass

Network Drive Support ?

Question from a client: Does Subversion support checking out to a "network drive" many miles away ? They are asking due to extremely slow checkouts across a WAN to a NAS drive. I need a technical answer with regards to the performance of subversion in this scenario. ( as if speaking to a 10 year

RE: Unable to use filter command properly.

-Original Message- From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name] Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 5:16 PM To: Rajnish Kumar Singh Cc: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: Unable to use filter command properly. Rajnish Kumar Singh wrote on Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 14:58:46 +0530: > H

RE: Unable to use filter command properly.

Hi Danial, I apologies for the last mail These are the output of 'svnadmin load' command. . . . . <<< Started new transaction, based on original revision 822 --- Committed revision 822 >>> <<< Started new transaction, based on original revision 823 --- Committed revision 823 >>>

Re: Unable to use filter command properly.

Rajnish Kumar Singh wrote on Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 14:58:46 +0530: > Hi, > > I am trying to use svndumpfilter command in order to filter one of the folder > in the entire repository. > I just want the dump of the that specific folder. > > So first I created a dump file using the following command

Re: SVN (numeric) error codes

Jason Heeris wrote on Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:51:16 +0800: > 1. Is there a list of these error codes anywhere? The only thing > I've found is the documentation for a header file[2], which is not > hugely helpful. That header file is the canonical documentation. Some functions document the error

mergeinfo on all root files and folders

Hi, We always do merges from the root of the repository. When these merges are done svn always marks up the mergeinfo on all first level files and folders as well as the root folder itself. Is this working as intended? We have had a practice for quite a while, dating back to buggy releases wher

Re: Svnsync regularly failing and keeping lock

On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 12:18:10PM +1100, Ben K wrote: > Hi there, > > I have two svn servers set up in a master-slave mirroring arrangement, using > HTTPS/SVNDav as the transport mechanism. The underlying link is an IPSEC > tunnel that links us in behind the firewall of the main part of the > org

mergeinfo on all root files and folders

Hi, We always do merges from the root of the repository. When these merges are done svn always marks up the mergeinfo on all first level files and folders as well as the root folder itself. Is this working as intended? We have had a practice for quite a while, dating back to buggy releases wher

RE: Path based authorization

Hi, Robert Johnson wrote: > I'm not sure this is a bug or the documentation is wrong, > or I'm misunderstanding the concept. > > In the SVN doc: > > Section 6.5 Path-Based Authorization > > [paint:/projects/paint] > > jane = r > > @paint-developers = rw > > > > Another important fact is that the

Unable to use filter command properly.

Hi, I am trying to use svndumpfilter command in order to filter one of the folder in the entire repository. I just want the dump of the that specific folder. So first I created a dump file using the following command: svnadmin dump E:\Repositories\OR1234 > E:\OR1234.dump I am using the followin

Re: Hi! I have problems

From: "mgolo...@metrotek.ru" >I have problems with Apache+dav_svn+ssl. When I update or >checkoutI receive error: REPORT of '/!svn/vcc/default': Could not read >response body: Secure connection truncated (https://svn.xxx.xx). >Early > >it appeared someti

Hi! I have problems

Hi everybody!!! I have problems with Apache+dav_svn+ssl. When I update or checkoutI receive error: REPORT of '/!svn/vcc/default': Could not read response body: Secure connection truncated (https://svn.xxx.xx ). Early it appeared sometimes, but now it shows always, big or