-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 02 Nov 2010 15:31:03 -0400, I said:
> TortoiseSVN has no problem operating on this repository, so
> either there's a bug in the binary, or, more likely, I haven't
> configured something in the command-line environment.
Nope, there's a probl
I am seeing the above error with some frequency, generally producing
the following three messages in the logs.
[Wed Nov 03 17:11:16 2010] [error] [client 10.1.3.105] Provider
encountered an error while streaming a REPORT response. [500, #0]
[Wed Nov 03 17:11:16 2010] [error] [client 10.1.3.105] A
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 6:26 AM, David Aldrich wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am running svn command line client 1.6.13 on Linux. Recently (possibly
> since upgrading from 1.6.6 to 1.6.13) I have found that whenever I run:
>
> svn up
>
> I am prompted for my password. I then choose to save it (unencrypted) bu
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 09:20:32PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Daniel Shahaf wrote on Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 21:17:09 +0200:
> > Andy Levy wrote on Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 15:04:29 -0400:
> > > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 14:54, Andersen, Krista
> > > wrote:
> > > > I tried posting a question to this use
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 21:17:09 +0200:
> Andy Levy wrote on Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 15:04:29 -0400:
> > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 14:54, Andersen, Krista
> > wrote:
> > > I tried posting a question to this users list last night and
> > > I still don't see it here (nor any responses
Andy Levy wrote on Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 15:04:29 -0400:
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 14:54, Andersen, Krista
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I tried posting a question to this users list last night and I still don't
> > see it here (nor any responses). Am I being blocked? Am I being too
> > impatient?
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 14:54, Andersen, Krista wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried posting a question to this users list last night and I still don't
> see it here (nor any responses). Am I being blocked? Am I being too
> impatient? Will I simply not see my own posts until someone replies?
Your own pos
Hi,
I tried posting a question to this users list last night and I still don't see
it here (nor any responses). Am I being blocked? Am I being too impatient?
Will I simply not see my own posts until someone replies?
I think the same thing happened to me on the last couple questions I posted
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Andy Levy wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 09:44, KM wrote:
> A "permanent branch" with no merging sounds more like a fork than a
> branch.
It's pretty common, really. You're about to do a release, so you make
a release branch. In many sites, they don't bother mer
On 11/3/2010 11:56 AM, Andy Levy wrote:
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 09:44, KM wrote:
We don't often use branching and/or merging based on the simple nature of our
version releases with very little overlap. We have a longer ranging version -
the next 7 months or so in progress. Since we are get
PGSEM Contractor 4 wrote on Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 17:01:30 +:
> When I get to trying to run Visual Studio's command line (devenv) I can't
> locate the subversion_vcnet.sln file, nor the earlier subversion_msvc.dsw
> file.
>
> What step(s) have I missed?
>
Running gen-make.py.
Hello,
I'm trying to build Subversion on VS2008 but am missing something. Could I get
some pointers please?
What I've done so far (based on the instructions in the INSTALL text file in
src-trunk) is:
*Downloaded an SVN client
*Checked out src-trunk ( svn co
https://svn.apache
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 09:44, KM wrote:
>
> We don't often use branching and/or merging based on the simple nature of our
> version releases with very little overlap. We have a longer ranging version
> - the next 7 months or so in progress. Since we are getting ready to
> deliver some file c
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 17:18:54 +0100:
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Johan Corveleyn wrote on Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:17:34 +0100:
> >> (the upcoming 1.7 release will improve the situation a bit, IIUC: the
> >> not-affected-subtrees will no longe
Thanks. My sentiments exactly. Never branch really - and... I probably will
not branch for this either !!
And yes... so far of course I have never changed a tag of the version released
to the field and don't really plan to. I'll make another if necessary.
Just trying to think ahead in ca
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:17:34 +0100:
>> (the upcoming 1.7 release will improve the situation a bit, IIUC: the
>> not-affected-subtrees will no longer have their mergeinfo updated all
>> the time, only if they are affec
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:17:34 +0100:
> (the upcoming 1.7 release will improve the situation a bit, IIUC: the
> not-affected-subtrees will no longer have their mergeinfo updated all
> the time, only if they are affected by the merge).
That surprised me a little, but a quick
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 15:23:51 +0100:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> > [empty reply]
>
> Huh? Was this mail supposed to contain an answer, Daniel?
>
No; it was accidentally sent.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:44 AM, KM wrote:
>
> We don't often use branching and/or merging based on the simple
> nature of our version releases with very little overlap.
>
> Any reason that creating a permanent branch on the tree would matter
> -- i mean never merging it anywhere? I don't see wh
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> David Aldrich wrote on Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 15:48:40 +0100:
>> Hi
>>
>> Please will someone explain the following error message that I received
>> while updating a working copy?
>>
>> "XML document structures must start and end within the sa
Hi,
I tested with a reproduction scenario and found this:
A) If I do an svn update on the top-level WC before the merge command,
the merge goes through OK and I can checkin.
B) If I don't do an svn update on the top-level WC before the merge
command, the merge goes wrong and svn complains about o
2010/11/3 Cédric Louboutin
> Why are the folder containing external files and the external files modified
> when I merge some revision from trunk to branch ? Knowing that the trunk
> revision does not include any modifications on these files.
>
> Regards.
>
> Server information :
> OS : Windows
On Nov 3, 2010, at 05:54, Florin Avram wrote:
> I've run over a strange situation and want to know if this is OK to happen
> (in my opinion it shouldn't). These are the details:
> - one of our servers has a repository with Subversion 1.4 format
> - I have a working copy from a given repository p
Hi,
I've run over a strange situation and want to know if this is OK to happen (in
my opinion it shouldn't). These are the details:
- one of our servers has a repository with Subversion 1.4 format
- I have a working copy from a given repository path, let it be
"http://R/svn/repos/userguide";
- i
We don't often use branching and/or merging based on the simple nature of our
version releases with very little overlap. We have a longer ranging version -
the next 7 months or so in progress. Since we are getting ready to deliver
some file changes I'd like to use the trunk instead of a branc
Ryan Schmidt wrote on Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 04:48:21 -0500:
> Minor bug report in the way Subversion prints output when I'm updating
> multiple targets, some of which have changes and some of which do not.
>
> Imagine I have directories a, b and c, and I ask Subversion to update
> all three, but on
Paul Maier wrote on Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 07:33:32 +0100:
> Hello,
>
> Obverved:
> All svn output, error messages, online help comes in German.
> But "svn help status", "svn help switch" and "svn help update"
> print in English.
>
> Expected:
> "svn help status", "svn help switch" and "svn help u
Hi
I am running svn command line client 1.6.13 on Linux. Recently (possibly since
upgrading from 1.6.6 to 1.6.13) I have found that whenever I run:
svn up
I am prompted for my password. I then choose to save it (unencrypted) but next
time around I am prompted for it again.
Any idea why this
Minor bug report in the way Subversion prints output when I'm updating multiple
targets, some of which have changes and some of which do not.
Imagine I have directories a, b and c, and I ask Subversion to update all
three, but only b has changes. The output received with Subversion 1.6.13 on
Ma
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Pieter-Jan Busschaert
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here is some more information:
>
>>> Inside branch1/subfolder, we do a merge from trunk/subfolder.
>>
>> Do you mean trunk/project/subfolder here?
>
> yes
>
>> Anyway, branch1/subfolder does not have any mergeinfo,
>> since
30 matches
Mail list logo
