Hi Guys!
Tortoise SVN throwing an error on Commit:-
"REPORT of '/svn/projectname/!svn/vcc/default':Could not read chunk
size:Secure connection truncated(project URL)"
My perception is this belongs to Network Traffic or Fluctuation in Network:
- Is this TRUE?
Pls share your r
Hi
One of our remote svn users is getting the following error when he attempts to
checkout a repo from our svn server:
svn: REPORT of '/subversion//!svn/vcc/default': Could not read chunk
delimiter: Secure connection truncated ()
We know that our repo is in good order because checkouts on the
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:19:34AM +, David Aldrich wrote:
> Hi
>
> One of our remote svn users is getting the following error when he attempts
> to checkout a repo from our svn server:
>
> svn: REPORT of '/subversion//!svn/vcc/default': Could not read chunk
> delimiter: Secure connection t
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:12:34PM +0500, Waseem Bokhari wrote:
> Hi Guys!
> Tortoise SVN throwing an error on Commit:-
>
> "REPORT of '/svn/projectname/!svn/vcc/default':Could not read chunk
> size:Secure connection truncated(project URL)"
>
> My perception is this belongs to
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> Sent: 18 August 2011 12:12
> To: David Aldrich
> Cc: 'users@subversion.apache.org'
> Subject: Re: Could not read chunk delimiter: Secure connection truncated
>
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:19:34AM +, David Aldrich
Hi,
Can Subversion 1.7 still have tree conflicts?
Or can the new working copy break them down to individual conflicts on
files (and directory properties)?
Best regards
Markus Schaber
___
We software Automation.
3S-Smart Software Solutions GmbH
Markus Schaber | Develope
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 04:54:15PM +0200, Markus Schaber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can Subversion 1.7 still have tree conflicts?
Yes. Nothing much has changed on that front for 1.7.
Foundations for some bigger changes in tree-conflict behaviour planned
for 1.8 and later are already being worked on.
> Or
Hi,
Von: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 04:54:15PM +0200, Markus Schaber wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can Subversion 1.7 still have tree conflicts?
>
> Yes. Nothing much has changed on that front for 1.7.
> Foundations for some bigger changes in tree-conflict behaviou
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 05:30:59PM +0200, Markus Schaber wrote:
> My idea was that directories itsself would never conflict. If there's a
> directory removed, and a new one created with the same name, it is the
> same directory, so no tree conflict. If the directories have different
> properties, t
Hi list
I am using Subversion with TortoiseSVN over HTTPs.
Now that I access my SVN server in Germany from Thailand and displaying logs
and getting diffs is horribly slow, I wonder if I can enable any kind of
compression?
Regards,
André
On Aug 18, 2011, at 11:39, André Hänsel wrote:
> I am using Subversion with TortoiseSVN over HTTPs.
>
> Now that I access my SVN server in Germany from Thailand and displaying logs
> and getting diffs is horribly slow, I wonder if I can enable any kind of
> compression?
The topic recently came
Markus Schaber wrote on Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 17:30:59 +0200:
> Hi,
>
>
> Von: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> > On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 04:54:15PM +0200, Markus Schaber wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Can Subversion 1.7 still have tree conflicts?
> >
> > Yes. Nothing much has changed on th
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 16.08.2011, 11:14 -0400 schrieb Mark Phippard:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Martin Kutter
> wrote:
> > is there a way to receive get post-commit error messages on performing a
> > commit with the JavaHL bindings?
>
> Subclipse uses JavaHL and I believe it shows these
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:13:09 +, Stefan Sperling wrote:
...
> But I don't think subversion should enforce one particular merge outcome.
> My opinion is that the user should be given a choice, and be supported
> by an interactive conflict resolution prompt that shows all possible
> resolution str
On 18-Aug-11 19:05, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
What copyfrom would the single directory have, in the case of an add/add
conflict?
The same as if you resolve an add/add file conflict by manually throwing the two
file contents into one file: you may wish a double copyfrom, to trace back to
both origi
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 07:22:28PM +0200, Andreas Krey wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:13:09 +, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> ...
> > But I don't think subversion should enforce one particular merge outcome.
> > My opinion is that the user should be given a choice, and be supported
> > by an interac
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 08:41:44PM +0200, Stein Somers wrote:
> On 18-Aug-11 19:05, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >What copyfrom would the single directory have, in the case of an add/add
> >conflict?
>
> The same as if you resolve an add/add file conflict by manually
> throwing the two file contents int
Stein Somers wrote on Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 20:41:44 +0200:
> On 18-Aug-11 19:05, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >What copyfrom would the single directory have, in the case of an add/add
> >conflict?
>
> The same as if you resolve an add/add file conflict by manually
> throwing the two file contents into o
Hello,
Recently I upgraded from 1.6.9 to 1.6.17. 'svn up' is very noticeably
slower than it used to be. I didn't see anything in the CHANGES file
about signficant 'update' changes so I was wondering if this was expected?
With 1.6.9 I didn't turn off authz (even though I don't use it) but I
thou
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:36:29AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Seth Daniel
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've done many subversion installs but never have I seen the following
> > problem before.
> >
> > Vanilla Centos 5.4. Subversion 1.6.17 (compiled and packag
svn-crash-log20110818104557.log
Description: Binary data
21 matches
Mail list logo
